2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Rural and Urban Transit District Benchmarking—Effectiveness and Efficiency Guidance Document

Jeffrey Arndt, Suzie Edrington

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Rural and urban transit systems have sought ways to compare performance across agencies, identifying successful service delivery strategies and applying these concepts to achieve successful results within their agency. Benchmarking is a method used to accomplish this goal. Benchmarking is a means of comparing performance to an established performance baseline. Benchmarks are typically established through the process of identifying successful business practices through performance measurement. This guidance document establishes peer groupings for rural and urban transit districts, calculates effectiveness and efficiency factors within the peer groups, and identifies transferable elements of high performers that may provide transit districts information applicable to improve their own performance. The goal of this guidance document is to help rural and urban transit districts better understand and set targets for performance, increasing the return on federal and state transit investment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rural and urban transit systems have sought ways to compare performance across agencies, identifying successful service delivery strategies and applying these concepts to achieve successful results within their agency. Benchmarking is a method used to accomplish this goal. Benchmarking is a means of comparing performance to an established performance baseline. Benchmarks are typically established through the process of identifying successful business practices through performance measurement. This guidance document establishes peer groupings for rural and urban transit districts, calculates effectiveness and efficiency factors within the peer groups, and identifies transferable elements of high performers that may provide transit districts information applicable to improve their own performance. The goal of this guidance document is to help rural and urban transit districts better understand and set targets for performance, increasing the return on federal and state transit investment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rural and urban transit systems have sought ways to compare performance across agencies, identifying successful service delivery strategies and applying these concepts to achieve successful results within their agency. Benchmarking is a method used to accomplish this goal. Benchmarking is a means of comparing performance to an established performance baseline. Benchmarks are typically established through the process of identifying successful business practices through performance measurement. This guidance document establishes peer groupings for rural and urban transit districts, calculates effectiveness and efficiency factors within the peer groups, and identifies transferable elements of high performers that may provide transit districts information applicable to improve their own performance. The goal of this guidance document is to help rural and urban transit districts better understand and set targets for performance, increasing the return on federal and state transit investment.

Key concepts: Benchmarking, Business, Agency (philosophy), Baseline (sea), Investment (military), Transport engineering, Transit (satellite), Public transport

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rural and Urban Transit District Benchmarking—Effectiveness and Efficiency Guidance Document — Research Paper | ScholarLens