PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR RURAL TRANSIT OPERATORS
D N Carter, T J Lomax, Jenson
Abstract
D N Carter, T J Lomax, Jenson
Abstract
Despite the increased interest in performance indicators for large transit systems, there has not been an equal effort at establishing similar techniques for small and rural systems. In response to this problem, this project developed a methodology to evaluate the relative performance of the Section 18 operators. It was found that the agencies could be compared using measures of cost efficiency, cost effectiveness, service utilization, vehicle utilization, quality of service, labor productivity, and accessibility. The transit agencies and the Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation can use these measures for analysis of performance trends, evaluation of overall system performance, transit planning, and technical assistance. The procedure uses a standard score methodology to compare the performance of individual agencies to the mean of all rural transit operators in Texas. It was determined that the use of peer groups of similar agencies would not significantly change the conclusions regarding agency performance. Peer groups would, however, increase the time to prepare a performance evaluation and the agencies within each peer group would change annually, making trend comparisons more difficult.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Despite the increased interest in performance indicators for large transit systems, there has not been an equal effort at establishing similar techniques for small and rural systems. In response to this problem, this project developed a methodology to evaluate the relative performance of the Section 18 operators. It was found that the agencies could be compared using measures of cost efficiency, cost effectiveness, service utilization, vehicle utilization, quality of service, labor productivity, and accessibility. The transit agencies and the Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation can use these measures for analysis of performance trends, evaluation of overall system performance, transit planning, and technical assistance. The procedure uses a standard score methodology to compare the performance of individual agencies to the mean of all rural transit operators in Texas. It was determined that the use of peer groups of similar agencies would not significantly change the conclusions regarding agency performance. Peer groups would, however, increase the time to prepare a performance evaluation and the agencies within each peer group would change annually, making trend comparisons more difficult.
Key concepts: Public transport, Transit (satellite), Agency (philosophy), Transport engineering, Business, Service (business), Productivity, Operations management