2009Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical CollegeRequires access

Clinical Observation of Fluoxetine on Post-stroke Depression and Neurologic Impairment

Du We

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To observe the efficacy of fluoxetine on post -stroke depression and neurologic impairment. Methods: 86 cases of post-stroke depression patients were randomly divided into two groups with 43 cases respectively, the patients in the treatment group were administered with fluoxetine besides conventional way, The control group were treated with conventional way. Then, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Barthel Index (BI) and Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) were used to evaluate the curative effect and adverse effects between the two groups before and after the treatment. Results: There was a marked decline of HAMD score in the treatment group after the treatment compared with that before the treatment (P 0.01). However, there was no difference in the control group after the treatment compared with that before the treatment in same time (P0.05); There was a marked decline of SSS score in the treatment group compared with that before the treatment (P0.01), and, a marked elevation of BI score in the treatment group compared with that before the treatment (P 0.01). Conclusion: Fluoxetine is effective in treatment of post -stroke depression and is prominent on the process of neurofunctional rehabilitation with a little adverse effects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To observe the efficacy of fluoxetine on post -stroke depression and neurologic impairment. Methods: 86 cases of post-stroke depression patients were randomly divided into two groups with 43 cases respectively, the patients in the treatment group were administered with fluoxetine besides conventional way, The control group were treated with conventional way. Then, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Barthel Index (BI) and Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) were used to evaluate the curative effect and adverse effects between the two groups before and after the treatment. Results: There was a marked decline of HAMD score in the treatment group after the treatment compared with that before the treatment (P 0.01). However, there was no difference in the control group after the treatment compared with that before the treatment in same time (P0.05); There was a marked decline of SSS score in the treatment group compared with that before the treatment (P0.01), and, a marked elevation of BI score in the treatment group compared with that before the treatment (P 0.01). Conclusion: Fluoxetine is effective in treatment of post -stroke depression and is prominent on the process of neurofunctional rehabilitation with a little adverse effects.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To observe the efficacy of fluoxetine on post -stroke depression and neurologic impairment. Methods: 86 cases of post-stroke depression patients were randomly divided into two groups with 43 cases respectively, the patients in the treatment group were administered with fluoxetine besides conventional way, The control group were treated with conventional way. Then, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Barthel Index (BI) and Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) were used to evaluate the curative effect and adverse effects between the two groups before and after the treatment. Results: There was a marked decline of HAMD score in the treatment group after the treatment compared with that before the treatment (P 0.01). However, there was no difference in the control group after the treatment compared with that before the treatment in same time (P0.05); There was a marked decline of SSS score in the treatment group compared with that before the treatment (P0.01), and, a marked elevation of BI score in the treatment group compared with that before the treatment (P 0.01). Conclusion: Fluoxetine is effective in treatment of post -stroke depression and is prominent on the process of neurofunctional rehabilitation with a little adverse effects.

Key concepts: Hamd, Medicine, SSS*, Fluoxetine, Post-stroke depression, Depression (economics), Barthel index, Stroke (engine)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Observation of Fluoxetine on Post-stroke Depression and Neurologic Impairment — Research Paper | ScholarLens