2015Zhonghua laonian yixue zazhiRequires access

Sedative effect and safety of small doses of Sufentanil combined with Propofol in painless gastroscopy

Zhenjing Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the Sedative effect and safety of intravenous Sufentanil combined with Propofol in painless gastroscopy. Methods 270 patients with ASA I-II were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (the Propofol group), Group B (the Fentanyl combined with Propofol group) and Group C (the Sufentanil combined with Propofol group). HR, MAP and SpO2 were monitored at three different time points: before placement of the gastroscope, during and 5 minutes after gastroscopy. The time required for consciousness recovery, the time required for regaining orientation, the operating time for gastroscopy and the dosage of Propofol were recorded. Results HR, MAP and SpO2 were obviously lower during operation than before or after operation in each group (P<0.05) and were significant different among the groups (P<0.05). The times required for consciousness recovery and for regaining orientation, respectively, were significantly longer in Group A than in Group B or C, and there was a significantly difference between Group B and Group C (P<0.05). The total dose of Propofol in Group A was significantly larger than that in Group B or C (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with Propofol alone or Fentanyl combined with Propofol, Sufentanil can be used in combination with lower does of Propofol in painless gastroscopy to produce rapid and effective Sedation, with fewer side effects and higher patient satisfaction. Key words: Sufentanil; Propofol; Gastroscopy

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the Sedative effect and safety of intravenous Sufentanil combined with Propofol in painless gastroscopy. Methods 270 patients with ASA I-II were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (the Propofol group), Group B (the Fentanyl combined with Propofol group) and Group C (the Sufentanil combined with Propofol group). HR, MAP and SpO2 were monitored at three different time points: before placement of the gastroscope, during and 5 minutes after gastroscopy. The time required for consciousness recovery, the time required for regaining orientation, the operating time for gastroscopy and the dosage of Propofol were recorded. Results HR, MAP and SpO2 were obviously lower during operation than before or after operation in each group (P<0.05) and were significant different among the groups (P<0.05). The times required for consciousness recovery and for regaining orientation, respectively, were significantly longer in Group A than in Group B or C, and there was a significantly difference between Group B and Group C (P<0.05). The total dose of Propofol in Group A was significantly larger than that in Group B or C (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with Propofol alone or Fentanyl combined with Propofol, Sufentanil can be used in combination with lower does of Propofol in painless gastroscopy to produce rapid and effective Sedation, with fewer side effects and higher patient satisfaction. Key words: Sufentanil; Propofol; Gastroscopy

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the Sedative effect and safety of intravenous Sufentanil combined with Propofol in painless gastroscopy. Methods 270 patients with ASA I-II were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (the Propofol group), Group B (the Fentanyl combined with Propofol group) and Group C (the Sufentanil combined with Propofol group). HR, MAP and SpO2 were monitored at three different time points: before placement of the gastroscope, during and 5 minutes after gastroscopy. The time required for consciousness recovery, the time required for regaining orientation, the operating time for gastroscopy and the dosage of Propofol were recorded. Results HR, MAP and SpO2 were obviously lower during operation than before or after operation in each group (P<0.05) and were significant different among the groups (P<0.05). The times required for consciousness recovery and for regaining orientation, respectively, were significantly longer in Group A than in Group B or C, and there was a significantly difference between Group B and Group C (P<0.05). The total dose of Propofol in Group A was significantly larger than that in Group B or C (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with Propofol alone or Fentanyl combined with Propofol, Sufentanil can be used in combination with lower does of Propofol in painless gastroscopy to produce rapid and effective Sedation, with fewer side effects and higher patient satisfaction. Key words: Sufentanil; Propofol; Gastroscopy

Key concepts: Propofol, Sufentanil, Medicine, Fentanyl, Anesthesia, Sedation, Sedative, Group B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sedative effect and safety of small doses of Sufentanil combined with Propofol in painless gastroscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens