2017Central Plains Medical JournalRequires access

Clinical effects of etomidate combined with dezocine and propofol combined with dezocine on the process of anesthesia during painless abortion

Zhipai Lyu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of etomidate combined with dezocine and propofol combined with dezocine on the process of anesthesia during painless abortion. Methods From December 2014 to March 2016, 161 cases of pregnant women were treated and implemented painless operation in hospital. They were randomly divided into two groups, 82 patients in group A were given etomidate combined with dezocine anesthesia, 79 patients in the group B were given propofol combined with dezocine anesthesia. The vital signs, time index, VAS scores and adverse reaction conditions in the two groups were tested and compared. Results Two min before anesthesia, the heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05); 2 min after operation, the vital signs of group A compared with the group B had obvious differences (P 0.05); the SBP and DBP in group B 2 min after awake compared with 2 min before anesthesia, there was significant difference (P 0.05); 35 cases (42.68%) adverse reactions occurred in patients with group A, lower than that in group B of 47 cases (59.49%)(χ2=4.5499, P=0.0329). Conclusions Etomidate combined with dezocine anesthetic has good effect on patients with painless induced abortion, has lower VAS score, shorter time of consciousness recovery and discharge, lower adverse reaction rate, little influence on vital signs. Key words: Etomidate combined with dezocine; Propofol combined with dezocine; Anesthesia in painless abortion; Clinical effect

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical effects of etomidate combined with dezocine and propofol combined with dezocine on the process of anesthesia during painless abortion. Methods From December 2014 to March 2016, 161 cases of pregnant women were treated and implemented painless operation in hospital. They were randomly divided into two groups, 82 patients in group A were given etomidate combined with dezocine anesthesia, 79 patients in the group B were given propofol combined with dezocine anesthesia. The vital signs, time index, VAS scores and adverse reaction conditions in the two groups were tested and compared. Results Two min before anesthesia, the heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05); 2 min after operation, the vital signs of group A compared with the group B had obvious differences (P 0.05); the SBP and DBP in group B 2 min after awake compared with 2 min before anesthesia, there was significant difference (P 0.05); 35 cases (42.68%) adverse reactions occurred in patients with group A, lower than that in group B of 47 cases (59.49%)(χ2=4.5499, P=0.0329). Conclusions Etomidate combined with dezocine anesthetic has good effect on patients with painless induced abortion, has lower VAS score, shorter time of consciousness recovery and discharge, lower adverse reaction rate, little influence on vital signs. Key words: Etomidate combined with dezocine; Propofol combined with dezocine; Anesthesia in painless abortion; Clinical effect

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of etomidate combined with dezocine and propofol combined with dezocine on the process of anesthesia during painless abortion. Methods From December 2014 to March 2016, 161 cases of pregnant women were treated and implemented painless operation in hospital. They were randomly divided into two groups, 82 patients in group A were given etomidate combined with dezocine anesthesia, 79 patients in the group B were given propofol combined with dezocine anesthesia. The vital signs, time index, VAS scores and adverse reaction conditions in the two groups were tested and compared. Results Two min before anesthesia, the heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05); 2 min after operation, the vital signs of group A compared with the group B had obvious differences (P 0.05); the SBP and DBP in group B 2 min after awake compared with 2 min before anesthesia, there was significant difference (P 0.05); 35 cases (42.68%) adverse reactions occurred in patients with group A, lower than that in group B of 47 cases (59.49%)(χ2=4.5499, P=0.0329). Conclusions Etomidate combined with dezocine anesthetic has good effect on patients with painless induced abortion, has lower VAS score, shorter time of consciousness recovery and discharge, lower adverse reaction rate, little influence on vital signs. Key words: Etomidate combined with dezocine; Propofol combined with dezocine; Anesthesia in painless abortion; Clinical effect

Key concepts: Dezocine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Propofol, Etomidate, Blood pressure, Vital signs, Heart rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical effects of etomidate combined with dezocine and propofol combined with dezocine on the process of anesthesia during painless abortion — Research Paper | ScholarLens