2002Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological SocietyRequires access

Comparison of Corneal Thickness Measurements Between Orbscan Topography System and Ultrasonic Pachymetry before and after LASIK

Geun-Jang Lee, Hungwon Tchah

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose : To report the difference of the values of the corneal thickness measurement measured by Orbscan topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry is different between pre-LASIK and post-LASIK. Methods : The corneal thickness measured by these two methods was compared in 32 pre-LASIK eyes of 18 subjects and 31 post-LASIK eyes of 20 subjects passed 3 months after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Results : In the pre-LASIK eyes, the cornea measured thicker by Orbscan topography system than by ultrasonic pachymeter (16.9413.1 , averagestandard deviation, p=0.001). In the post-LASIK eyes, there was no statistically significant difference in the values of corneal thickness measurement between two methods (–9.5827.88 , p=0.0653). Conclusion : We must give attention to the interpretation of values of corneal thickness measurement measured by Orbscan topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry because the correlations between the two methods in pre and post-LASIK eyes are different. We assume that differences of the values of measurement between the two methods may result from either technical errors of the measurers, interference of corneal interface, or change of tear film.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose : To report the difference of the values of the corneal thickness measurement measured by Orbscan topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry is different between pre-LASIK and post-LASIK. Methods : The corneal thickness measured by these two methods was compared in 32 pre-LASIK eyes of 18 subjects and 31 post-LASIK eyes of 20 subjects passed 3 months after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Results : In the pre-LASIK eyes, the cornea measured thicker by Orbscan topography system than by ultrasonic pachymeter (16.9413.1 , averagestandard deviation, p=0.001). In the post-LASIK eyes, there was no statistically significant difference in the values of corneal thickness measurement between two methods (–9.5827.88 , p=0.0653). Conclusion : We must give attention to the interpretation of values of corneal thickness measurement measured by Orbscan topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry because the correlations between the two methods in pre and post-LASIK eyes are different. We assume that differences of the values of measurement between the two methods may result from either technical errors of the measurers, interference of corneal interface, or change of tear film.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose : To report the difference of the values of the corneal thickness measurement measured by Orbscan topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry is different between pre-LASIK and post-LASIK. Methods : The corneal thickness measured by these two methods was compared in 32 pre-LASIK eyes of 18 subjects and 31 post-LASIK eyes of 20 subjects passed 3 months after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Results : In the pre-LASIK eyes, the cornea measured thicker by Orbscan topography system than by ultrasonic pachymeter (16.9413.1 , averagestandard deviation, p=0.001). In the post-LASIK eyes, there was no statistically significant difference in the values of corneal thickness measurement between two methods (–9.5827.88 , p=0.0653). Conclusion : We must give attention to the interpretation of values of corneal thickness measurement measured by Orbscan topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry because the correlations between the two methods in pre and post-LASIK eyes are different. We assume that differences of the values of measurement between the two methods may result from either technical errors of the measurers, interference of corneal interface, or change of tear film.

Key concepts: LASIK, Keratomileusis, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Corneal topography, Ultrasonic sensor, Cornea, Optics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Corneal Thickness Measurements Between Orbscan Topography System and Ultrasonic Pachymetry before and after LASIK — Research Paper | ScholarLens