2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of D-Dimer PLUS assay with NycoCard D-Dimer

Désirée Coen Herak, Renata Zadro

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Measurement of D-dimer levels has gained widespread use in the diagnosis of various clinical situations that relate to thrombosis and fibrinolysis. Nowadays, different rapid and fully automated quantitative D-Dimer assays that can be performed on coagulation analyzers are commercially available. The aim of our study was to compare two rapid and quantitative D-Dimer assays based on different methodology: NycoCard D-Dimer (Axis-Shield, Oslo, Norway) based upon the immunometric flowthrough principle with a new fully automated latex-enhanced turbidimetric test D-Dimer PLUS (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany). D-dimer concentrations were measured in fresh plasma samples of 56 patients with request for the determination of D-dimer, using the NycoCard D-Dimer on NycoCard READER II. Samples were frozen for later measurement of D-dimer with the D-Dimer PLUS assay on a BCS analyzer. Results obtained with NycoCard D-Dimer ranged from 0.1 to > 20.0 mg/L (cut-off value 0.3 mg/L) whilst the results obtained with D-Dimer PLUS ranged from 0.06 to 6.01 mg/L (cut-off value 0.19 mg/L). The relationship between D-Dimer PLUS and NycoCard showed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.713 with a regression equation of y = 0.3 x + 0.18. The majority of D-dimer levels were comparable between assays, being approximately two to three times higher with Nycocard D-Dimer as compared to D-Dimer PLUS. The greatest discrepancy between results was found above the cut-off value (in the range of 0.3-0.5 mg/L) for Nycocard D-Dimer: normal D-dimer levels (range 0.12-0.18 mg/L) were obtained in 7 out of 14 plasma samples with D-Dimer PLUS.The results show that the standardization of D-Dimer assay is crucial and that discrepancy in the obtained results can be due to different calibrators and different monoclonal antibodies used (DD5 vs. S4H9) as well as different cut-off values applied.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Measurement of D-dimer levels has gained widespread use in the diagnosis of various clinical situations that relate to thrombosis and fibrinolysis. Nowadays, different rapid and fully automated quantitative D-Dimer assays that can be performed on coagulation analyzers are commercially available. The aim of our study was to compare two rapid and quantitative D-Dimer assays based on different methodology: NycoCard D-Dimer (Axis-Shield, Oslo, Norway) based upon the immunometric flowthrough principle with a new fully automated latex-enhanced turbidimetric test D-Dimer PLUS (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany). D-dimer concentrations were measured in fresh plasma samples of 56 patients with request for the determination of D-dimer, using the NycoCard D-Dimer on NycoCard READER II. Samples were frozen for later measurement of D-dimer with the D-Dimer PLUS assay on a BCS analyzer. Results obtained with NycoCard D-Dimer ranged from 0.1 to > 20.0 mg/L (cut-off value 0.3 mg/L) whilst the results obtained with D-Dimer PLUS ranged from 0.06 to 6.01 mg/L (cut-off value 0.19 mg/L). The relationship between D-Dimer PLUS and NycoCard showed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.713 with a regression equation of y = 0.3 x + 0.18. The majority of D-dimer levels were comparable between assays, being approximately two to three times higher with Nycocard D-Dimer as compared to D-Dimer PLUS. The greatest discrepancy between results was found above the cut-off value (in the range of 0.3-0.5 mg/L) for Nycocard D-Dimer: normal D-dimer levels (range 0.12-0.18 mg/L) were obtained in 7 out of 14 plasma samples with D-Dimer PLUS.The results show that the standardization of D-Dimer assay is crucial and that discrepancy in the obtained results can be due to different calibrators and different monoclonal antibodies used (DD5 vs. S4H9) as well as different cut-off values applied.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Measurement of D-dimer levels has gained widespread use in the diagnosis of various clinical situations that relate to thrombosis and fibrinolysis. Nowadays, different rapid and fully automated quantitative D-Dimer assays that can be performed on coagulation analyzers are commercially available. The aim of our study was to compare two rapid and quantitative D-Dimer assays based on different methodology: NycoCard D-Dimer (Axis-Shield, Oslo, Norway) based upon the immunometric flowthrough principle with a new fully automated latex-enhanced turbidimetric test D-Dimer PLUS (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany). D-dimer concentrations were measured in fresh plasma samples of 56 patients with request for the determination of D-dimer, using the NycoCard D-Dimer on NycoCard READER II. Samples were frozen for later measurement of D-dimer with the D-Dimer PLUS assay on a BCS analyzer. Results obtained with NycoCard D-Dimer ranged from 0.1 to > 20.0 mg/L (cut-off value 0.3 mg/L) whilst the results obtained with D-Dimer PLUS ranged from 0.06 to 6.01 mg/L (cut-off value 0.19 mg/L). The relationship between D-Dimer PLUS and NycoCard showed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.713 with a regression equation of y = 0.3 x + 0.18. The majority of D-dimer levels were comparable between assays, being approximately two to three times higher with Nycocard D-Dimer as compared to D-Dimer PLUS. The greatest discrepancy between results was found above the cut-off value (in the range of 0.3-0.5 mg/L) for Nycocard D-Dimer: normal D-dimer levels (range 0.12-0.18 mg/L) were obtained in 7 out of 14 plasma samples with D-Dimer PLUS.The results show that the standardization of D-Dimer assay is crucial and that discrepancy in the obtained results can be due to different calibrators and different monoclonal antibodies used (DD5 vs. S4H9) as well as different cut-off values applied.

Key concepts: D-dimer, Dimer, Chemistry, Fibrinolysis, Analytical Chemistry (journal), Medicine, Chromatography, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of D-Dimer PLUS assay with NycoCard D-Dimer — Research Paper | ScholarLens