Implementing the “Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics”: What Is It Worth?
Lynne Alper, Dan Fendel, Sherry Fraser, Diane Resek
Abstract
Lynne Alper, Dan Fendel, Sherry Fraser, Diane Resek
Abstract
It used to be easy. You followed the book, and all books were very much alike in terms of content and approach. You occasionally supplemented the content with an activity of your own, but it was clear what was expected. A curriculum had been established, and everyone taught it in pretty much the same way. The idea was to train students to do specific types of problems.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It used to be easy. You followed the book, and all books were very much alike in terms of content and approach. You occasionally supplemented the content with an activity of your own, but it was clear what was expected. A curriculum had been established, and everyone taught it in pretty much the same way. The idea was to train students to do specific types of problems.
Key concepts: Content (measure theory), Curriculum, Mathematics education, Computer science, Multimedia, Pedagogy, Mathematics, Psychology