2013PubMedRequires access

[Effects and mechanism of osthole on intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice].

Zhen Zhang, Fanfan Li, Mingdian Lu, Yongxiang Li

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the protective role of osthole in intestinal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in mice and examine its underlying mechanism. METHODS: A murine model of intestinal I/R injury was established with clamping of superior mesenteric artery for 120 min and then clamping was relieved for 60 min. Forty-five SD male mice weighing 27-31 g were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 15 each): sham group (S), I/R injury group (I/R) and I/R plus osthole treatment group (Ost+). Intestinal wet/dry weight ratio, superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA) in serum were examined by colorimetric assay and diamine oxidase (DAO) was examined by automatic biochemical analyzer, the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-2 were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Intestinal barrier permeability was detected by Evans blue (EB) test. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze all experimental data variance. RESULTS: Intestinal tissues wet/dry weight ratios, Evans blue content and Chiu's score of I/R group mice were significantly higher than those of S and Ost+ groups (0.80% ± 0.03% vs 0.77% ± 0.02% & 0.78% ± 0.02%, (0.11 ± 0.04) vs (0.05 ± 0.02) & (0.06 ± 0.02) µg/mg, 3.42 ± 0.73 vs 0.87 ± 0.35 & 2.63 ± 0.58, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) . Serum level of DAO, MDA, IL-1β & TNF-α of I/R group mice were significantly higher than those of S and Ost+ groups ( (18.9 ± 4.0) vs (14.5 ± 2.3) & (16.0 ± 2.6) U/L, (8.4 ± 1.2) vs (6.9 ± 1.7) & (6.1 ± 2.4) µmol/L, (93 ± 6) vs (51 ± 4) & (67 ± 5) ng/L, (467 ± 31) vs (235 ± 21) & (323 ± 30) ng/L, P < 0.01 or P < 0.05) . Serum SOD activity and IL-2 level were significantly lower than those of S and Ost+ groups ( (75 ± 7) vs (93 ± 16) & (89 ± 5) U/ml, (95 ± 16) vs (198 ± 14) & (139 ± 11) ng/L, all P < 0.05) . All parameters showed no significant difference between S and Ost+ groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of osthole may protect murine intestinal tissue against intestinal I/R injury. And the mechanisms may be due to its actions of preventing oxygen stress and inflammatory responses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To explore the protective role of osthole in intestinal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in mice and examine its underlying mechanism. METHODS: A murine model of intestinal I/R injury was established with clamping of superior mesenteric artery for 120 min and then clamping was relieved for 60 min. Forty-five SD male mice weighing 27-31 g were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 15 each): sham group (S), I/R injury group (I/R) and I/R plus osthole treatment group (Ost+). Intestinal wet/dry weight ratio, superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA) in serum were examined by colorimetric assay and diamine oxidase (DAO) was examined by automatic biochemical analyzer, the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-2 were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Intestinal barrier permeability was detected by Evans blue (EB) test. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze all experimental data variance. RESULTS: Intestinal tissues wet/dry weight ratios, Evans blue content and Chiu's score of I/R group mice were significantly higher than those of S and Ost+ groups (0.80% ± 0.03% vs 0.77% ± 0.02% & 0.78% ± 0.02%, (0.11 ± 0.04) vs (0.05 ± 0.02) & (0.06 ± 0.02) µg/mg, 3.42 ± 0.73 vs 0.87 ± 0.35 & 2.63 ± 0.58, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) . Serum level of DAO, MDA, IL-1β & TNF-α of I/R group mice were significantly higher than those of S and Ost+ groups ( (18.9 ± 4.0) vs (14.5 ± 2.3) & (16.0 ± 2.6) U/L, (8.4 ± 1.2) vs (6.9 ± 1.7) & (6.1 ± 2.4) µmol/L, (93 ± 6) vs (51 ± 4) & (67 ± 5) ng/L, (467 ± 31) vs (235 ± 21) & (323 ± 30) ng/L, P < 0.01 or P < 0.05) . Serum SOD activity and IL-2 level were significantly lower than those of S and Ost+ groups ( (75 ± 7) vs (93 ± 16) & (89 ± 5) U/ml, (95 ± 16) vs (198 ± 14) & (139 ± 11) ng/L, all P < 0.05) . All parameters showed no significant difference between S and Ost+ groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of osthole may protect murine intestinal tissue against intestinal I/R injury. And the mechanisms may be due to its actions of preventing oxygen stress and inflammatory responses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the protective role of osthole in intestinal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in mice and examine its underlying mechanism. METHODS: A murine model of intestinal I/R injury was established with clamping of superior mesenteric artery for 120 min and then clamping was relieved for 60 min. Forty-five SD male mice weighing 27-31 g were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 15 each): sham group (S), I/R injury group (I/R) and I/R plus osthole treatment group (Ost+). Intestinal wet/dry weight ratio, superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA) in serum were examined by colorimetric assay and diamine oxidase (DAO) was examined by automatic biochemical analyzer, the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-2 were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Intestinal barrier permeability was detected by Evans blue (EB) test. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze all experimental data variance. RESULTS: Intestinal tissues wet/dry weight ratios, Evans blue content and Chiu's score of I/R group mice were significantly higher than those of S and Ost+ groups (0.80% ± 0.03% vs 0.77% ± 0.02% & 0.78% ± 0.02%, (0.11 ± 0.04) vs (0.05 ± 0.02) & (0.06 ± 0.02) µg/mg, 3.42 ± 0.73 vs 0.87 ± 0.35 & 2.63 ± 0.58, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) . Serum level of DAO, MDA, IL-1β & TNF-α of I/R group mice were significantly higher than those of S and Ost+ groups ( (18.9 ± 4.0) vs (14.5 ± 2.3) & (16.0 ± 2.6) U/L, (8.4 ± 1.2) vs (6.9 ± 1.7) & (6.1 ± 2.4) µmol/L, (93 ± 6) vs (51 ± 4) & (67 ± 5) ng/L, (467 ± 31) vs (235 ± 21) & (323 ± 30) ng/L, P < 0.01 or P < 0.05) . Serum SOD activity and IL-2 level were significantly lower than those of S and Ost+ groups ( (75 ± 7) vs (93 ± 16) & (89 ± 5) U/ml, (95 ± 16) vs (198 ± 14) & (139 ± 11) ng/L, all P < 0.05) . All parameters showed no significant difference between S and Ost+ groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of osthole may protect murine intestinal tissue against intestinal I/R injury. And the mechanisms may be due to its actions of preventing oxygen stress and inflammatory responses.

Key concepts: Diamine oxidase, Malondialdehyde, Evans Blue, Intestinal ischemia, Superoxide dismutase, Analysis of variance, Reperfusion injury, Superior mesenteric artery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Effects and mechanism of osthole on intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens