1999PubMedRequires access

Comparison of pronuclear stage embryo transfer and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer following intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Somboon Kunathikom, Suwit Suppinyopong, Roungsin Choavaratana, Sirilak Suksompong, S Julavijitpong, Phakphum Phophong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

To determine whether the mode of embryo transfer (PROST vs IVF) affected the outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, 237 ICSI cycles (106 PROST and 131 IVF) were analyzed. Several parameters, including patient age, duration of infertility, amounts of hMG used, number of mature eggs retrieved and injected, fertilization rate, number of embryos transferred, and clinical pregnancy rate, were compared. Most of the variable factors were not significantly different, except the mean numbers of transferred embryos which were significantly higher in the PROST group. The clinical pregnancy rate showed no statistical difference between PROST and IVF cycles (25.5 and 16.8%; p = 0.139). This study suggests that even the pregnancy rate in PROST cycles was slightly higher than IVF cycles, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To determine whether the mode of embryo transfer (PROST vs IVF) affected the outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, 237 ICSI cycles (106 PROST and 131 IVF) were analyzed. Several parameters, including patient age, duration of infertility, amounts of hMG used, number of mature eggs retrieved and injected, fertilization rate, number of embryos transferred, and clinical pregnancy rate, were compared. Most of the variable factors were not significantly different, except the mean numbers of transferred embryos which were significantly higher in the PROST group. The clinical pregnancy rate showed no statistical difference between PROST and IVF cycles (25.5 and 16.8%; p = 0.139). This study suggests that even the pregnancy rate in PROST cycles was slightly higher than IVF cycles, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To determine whether the mode of embryo transfer (PROST vs IVF) affected the outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, 237 ICSI cycles (106 PROST and 131 IVF) were analyzed. Several parameters, including patient age, duration of infertility, amounts of hMG used, number of mature eggs retrieved and injected, fertilization rate, number of embryos transferred, and clinical pregnancy rate, were compared. Most of the variable factors were not significantly different, except the mean numbers of transferred embryos which were significantly higher in the PROST group. The clinical pregnancy rate showed no statistical difference between PROST and IVF cycles (25.5 and 16.8%; p = 0.139). This study suggests that even the pregnancy rate in PROST cycles was slightly higher than IVF cycles, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Key concepts: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Andrology, Embryo transfer, Human fertilization, Embryo, In vitro fertilisation, Pregnancy rate, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of pronuclear stage embryo transfer and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. — Research Paper | ScholarLens