[Outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male infertility patients with a low number of oocytes retrieved].
Hongchuan Tan, Leining Chen, Ling He, Song Quan
Abstract
Hongchuan Tan, Leining Chen, Ling He, Song Quan
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in non-male infertility patients with a low number of oocytes retrieved and provide evidences for defining the indications of ICSI. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted among 220 non-male infertility patients with a low number of oocyte retrieved(≤5) including 151 receiving IVF and 69 undergoing ICSI. The baseline characteristics, ovary response index, fertilization results, embryo quality and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Although the fertilization rates, normal fertilization rates, complete fertilization failure rates, cleavage rates, good embryo rates, implantation rates and clinical pregnancy rates showed no significant differences between the 2 groups, the complete fertilization failure rates tended to decrease and the other indices tended to increase in IVF group. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI can not improve the fertilization results, embryonic development potential or clinical outcomes in non-male infertility patients with a low number of oocytes retrieved, and is therefore not recommended for these patients.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in non-male infertility patients with a low number of oocytes retrieved and provide evidences for defining the indications of ICSI. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted among 220 non-male infertility patients with a low number of oocyte retrieved(≤5) including 151 receiving IVF and 69 undergoing ICSI. The baseline characteristics, ovary response index, fertilization results, embryo quality and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Although the fertilization rates, normal fertilization rates, complete fertilization failure rates, cleavage rates, good embryo rates, implantation rates and clinical pregnancy rates showed no significant differences between the 2 groups, the complete fertilization failure rates tended to decrease and the other indices tended to increase in IVF group. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI can not improve the fertilization results, embryonic development potential or clinical outcomes in non-male infertility patients with a low number of oocytes retrieved, and is therefore not recommended for these patients.
Key concepts: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Human fertilization, In vitro fertilisation, Infertility, Embryo transfer, Andrology, Gynecology, Medicine