2006Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

A comparative study of two kinds of meropenem in treatment of bacterial infections

Jun Peng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM:To observe the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem and imported one. METHODS: A controlled clinical study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem with those of imported one. Forty-six patients were divided into domestic meropenem group and imported meropenem group,with 23 in each;under administration of 1 g every 8 h intravenously for each patient with corresponding domestic on imported meropenem for a course of 6 to 14 d respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients in domestic meropenem group and twenty-three patients in imported meropenem group were assessable for clinical efficacy; outcoming with clinical efficacy rates 91 % vs 91 % , bacterial eradication rates 80 % vs 82 % and adverse reaction rates 4 % vs 4 % respectively. There was no statistically difference between the two groups (P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Domestic meropenem is as effective and safe as imported meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM:To observe the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem and imported one. METHODS: A controlled clinical study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem with those of imported one. Forty-six patients were divided into domestic meropenem group and imported meropenem group,with 23 in each;under administration of 1 g every 8 h intravenously for each patient with corresponding domestic on imported meropenem for a course of 6 to 14 d respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients in domestic meropenem group and twenty-three patients in imported meropenem group were assessable for clinical efficacy; outcoming with clinical efficacy rates 91 % vs 91 % , bacterial eradication rates 80 % vs 82 % and adverse reaction rates 4 % vs 4 % respectively. There was no statistically difference between the two groups (P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Domestic meropenem is as effective and safe as imported meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM:To observe the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem and imported one. METHODS: A controlled clinical study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem with those of imported one. Forty-six patients were divided into domestic meropenem group and imported meropenem group,with 23 in each;under administration of 1 g every 8 h intravenously for each patient with corresponding domestic on imported meropenem for a course of 6 to 14 d respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients in domestic meropenem group and twenty-three patients in imported meropenem group were assessable for clinical efficacy; outcoming with clinical efficacy rates 91 % vs 91 % , bacterial eradication rates 80 % vs 82 % and adverse reaction rates 4 % vs 4 % respectively. There was no statistically difference between the two groups (P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Domestic meropenem is as effective and safe as imported meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections.

Key concepts: Meropenem, Medicine, Clinical efficacy, Adverse effect, Significant difference, Internal medicine, Antibiotics, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of two kinds of meropenem in treatment of bacterial infections — Research Paper | ScholarLens