2008Laboratory MedicineRequires access

Bias of measurement results of different methods determining high sensitivity C-reactive protein according to the guideline approved by CLSI

Zhang Ma

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the bias of measurement results using different methods determining high sensitivity C-reactive protein(Hs-CRP).Methods According to the EP9-A file approved by Clinical Laboratory Standardization Institute(CLSI),three test methods were compared with the comparison method,which formed three comparison groups.The comparison data in each group were presented in scatter figures and bias figures showing the linear equations and correlation coefficients while the biases of measurement results were evaluated.Results In each comparison group,the measurement results using the test method were well correlated with the results using the comparison method(r2=0.991 8,0.986 8,0.996 7).While Hs-CRP was 3 mg/L,three predicted relative biases were respectively 6.4%,32.3% and 24.4%.Conclusions The measurement results of Hs-CRP by the particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay using different reagent kits were coincided with each other.The bias of Hs-CRP measurement results between the particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay and the particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay was considerable.Comparing the method determining independently Hs-CRP with that determining simultaneously both Hs-CRP and CRP,the former can reduce the bias of Hs-CRP measurement results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the bias of measurement results using different methods determining high sensitivity C-reactive protein(Hs-CRP).Methods According to the EP9-A file approved by Clinical Laboratory Standardization Institute(CLSI),three test methods were compared with the comparison method,which formed three comparison groups.The comparison data in each group were presented in scatter figures and bias figures showing the linear equations and correlation coefficients while the biases of measurement results were evaluated.Results In each comparison group,the measurement results using the test method were well correlated with the results using the comparison method(r2=0.991 8,0.986 8,0.996 7).While Hs-CRP was 3 mg/L,three predicted relative biases were respectively 6.4%,32.3% and 24.4%.Conclusions The measurement results of Hs-CRP by the particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay using different reagent kits were coincided with each other.The bias of Hs-CRP measurement results between the particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay and the particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay was considerable.Comparing the method determining independently Hs-CRP with that determining simultaneously both Hs-CRP and CRP,the former can reduce the bias of Hs-CRP measurement results.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the bias of measurement results using different methods determining high sensitivity C-reactive protein(Hs-CRP).Methods According to the EP9-A file approved by Clinical Laboratory Standardization Institute(CLSI),three test methods were compared with the comparison method,which formed three comparison groups.The comparison data in each group were presented in scatter figures and bias figures showing the linear equations and correlation coefficients while the biases of measurement results were evaluated.Results In each comparison group,the measurement results using the test method were well correlated with the results using the comparison method(r2=0.991 8,0.986 8,0.996 7).While Hs-CRP was 3 mg/L,three predicted relative biases were respectively 6.4%,32.3% and 24.4%.Conclusions The measurement results of Hs-CRP by the particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay using different reagent kits were coincided with each other.The bias of Hs-CRP measurement results between the particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay and the particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay was considerable.Comparing the method determining independently Hs-CRP with that determining simultaneously both Hs-CRP and CRP,the former can reduce the bias of Hs-CRP measurement results.

Key concepts: Mathematics, Statistics, Sensitivity (control systems), Analytical Chemistry (journal), Chromatography, Chemistry, Engineering, Electronic engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bias of measurement results of different methods determining high sensitivity C-reactive protein according to the guideline approved by CLSI — Research Paper | ScholarLens