2008Journal of Bengbu Medical CollegeRequires access

Comparision of 2 types of optometry methods after the pupils of far-sighted sufferers were dilated

Feng Zheng-guo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To observe whether there exists difference in the test results of far-sighted ametropia sufferers' eyesight by computer optometry instruments and by streak retinoscope respetively after their pupils were dilated,and to know if the retinoscopy optometry can be replaced by computer optometry.Methods:Twenty-five far-sighted ametropia sufferers who had accepted optometry in 1996 in our hospital were selected at random.After their pulils were dilated,the computer optometry instrument and streak retinoscope were adopted respectively to test the ametropia degree;then the statistical data were analyzed.Results:Examination results by the two methods were significantly different(P0.01).Conclusions:The test results by computer optometry is not exact.It denotes that the retinoscopy optometry can still not be replaced by computer optometry;as the latter is simple,easy and fast in operation,it can be used as a reference for the former,and applied in popular examination as well.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To observe whether there exists difference in the test results of far-sighted ametropia sufferers' eyesight by computer optometry instruments and by streak retinoscope respetively after their pupils were dilated,and to know if the retinoscopy optometry can be replaced by computer optometry.Methods:Twenty-five far-sighted ametropia sufferers who had accepted optometry in 1996 in our hospital were selected at random.After their pulils were dilated,the computer optometry instrument and streak retinoscope were adopted respectively to test the ametropia degree;then the statistical data were analyzed.Results:Examination results by the two methods were significantly different(P0.01).Conclusions:The test results by computer optometry is not exact.It denotes that the retinoscopy optometry can still not be replaced by computer optometry;as the latter is simple,easy and fast in operation,it can be used as a reference for the former,and applied in popular examination as well.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To observe whether there exists difference in the test results of far-sighted ametropia sufferers' eyesight by computer optometry instruments and by streak retinoscope respetively after their pupils were dilated,and to know if the retinoscopy optometry can be replaced by computer optometry.Methods:Twenty-five far-sighted ametropia sufferers who had accepted optometry in 1996 in our hospital were selected at random.After their pulils were dilated,the computer optometry instrument and streak retinoscope were adopted respectively to test the ametropia degree;then the statistical data were analyzed.Results:Examination results by the two methods were significantly different(P0.01).Conclusions:The test results by computer optometry is not exact.It denotes that the retinoscopy optometry can still not be replaced by computer optometry;as the latter is simple,easy and fast in operation,it can be used as a reference for the former,and applied in popular examination as well.

Key concepts: Retinoscopy, Medicine, Optometry, Test (biology), Streak, Ophthalmology, Refractive error, Eye disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparision of 2 types of optometry methods after the pupils of far-sighted sufferers were dilated — Research Paper | ScholarLens