2012Xiandai yufang yixueRequires access

Analysis of comparing two different methods in diagnosis of the abnormal eyesight on screening eyesight

Wang Yan-jua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the two different ways in diagnosis of the abnormal eyesight of children from 2 years to 6 with Hand-held instrument automatically optometry Suresight made by America Welchallyn Co.,and observe the veracity,feasibility and creditability of the two ways.METHODS 228 children years between 2 and 6 were screened with Hand-held instrument automatically optometry Suresight,compared the screening results with two different diagnosing ways.RESULTS 58 eyes were diagnosed with abnormal diopter,21 eyes were hypermetropia,and 2 eyes were myopia.Among 456 eyes,58 eyes had retested,7 were hypermetropia,and 10 were myopia.There were marked difference between the detection rates of hypermetropia and myopia(P﹤0.025).CONCLUSION The first method checked-up hypermetropia was better than that of the second method,but less myopia.Hand-held instrument automatically optometry named Suresight should be more explored in using screening children's eyesight.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To compare the two different ways in diagnosis of the abnormal eyesight of children from 2 years to 6 with Hand-held instrument automatically optometry Suresight made by America Welchallyn Co.,and observe the veracity,feasibility and creditability of the two ways.METHODS 228 children years between 2 and 6 were screened with Hand-held instrument automatically optometry Suresight,compared the screening results with two different diagnosing ways.RESULTS 58 eyes were diagnosed with abnormal diopter,21 eyes were hypermetropia,and 2 eyes were myopia.Among 456 eyes,58 eyes had retested,7 were hypermetropia,and 10 were myopia.There were marked difference between the detection rates of hypermetropia and myopia(P﹤0.025).CONCLUSION The first method checked-up hypermetropia was better than that of the second method,but less myopia.Hand-held instrument automatically optometry named Suresight should be more explored in using screening children's eyesight.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the two different ways in diagnosis of the abnormal eyesight of children from 2 years to 6 with Hand-held instrument automatically optometry Suresight made by America Welchallyn Co.,and observe the veracity,feasibility and creditability of the two ways.METHODS 228 children years between 2 and 6 were screened with Hand-held instrument automatically optometry Suresight,compared the screening results with two different diagnosing ways.RESULTS 58 eyes were diagnosed with abnormal diopter,21 eyes were hypermetropia,and 2 eyes were myopia.Among 456 eyes,58 eyes had retested,7 were hypermetropia,and 10 were myopia.There were marked difference between the detection rates of hypermetropia and myopia(P﹤0.025).CONCLUSION The first method checked-up hypermetropia was better than that of the second method,but less myopia.Hand-held instrument automatically optometry named Suresight should be more explored in using screening children's eyesight.

Key concepts: Hypermetropia, Optometry, Medicine, Dioptre, Ophthalmology, Significant difference, Eye disease, Refractive error

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of comparing two different methods in diagnosis of the abnormal eyesight on screening eyesight — Research Paper | ScholarLens