2001•Qilu yixue zazhiRequires access

A COMPARISION OF RIA AND ECLIA IN SERUM AFP DETERMINATION

Wang Aiying

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To understand the advantage of ECLIA. Methods The AFP concentrations of 50 clinical specimens were determined by RIA and ECLIA. Results The two methods correlated well(r=0.996, P0.01) and both had a recovery rate of more than 95%.The ECLIA was better than RIA in linear and sensitivity tests. Conclusion ECLIA is preferable for clinical examination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To understand the advantage of ECLIA. Methods The AFP concentrations of 50 clinical specimens were determined by RIA and ECLIA. Results The two methods correlated well(r=0.996, P0.01) and both had a recovery rate of more than 95%.The ECLIA was better than RIA in linear and sensitivity tests. Conclusion ECLIA is preferable for clinical examination.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To understand the advantage of ECLIA. Methods The AFP concentrations of 50 clinical specimens were determined by RIA and ECLIA. Results The two methods correlated well(r=0.996, P0.01) and both had a recovery rate of more than 95%.The ECLIA was better than RIA in linear and sensitivity tests. Conclusion ECLIA is preferable for clinical examination.

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A COMPARISION OF RIA AND ECLIA IN SERUM AFP DETERMINATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens