2001•PubMedRequires access

[The diagnostic value and limitations of total serum bile acid determined enzymatically].

Xiaolan Yang, Lei J, Y Zhang, X Tang, Yixiang Zheng, J Chen

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the diagnostic value of total serum bile acid. METHOD: Clinical data from 913 cases was statistically analyzed with SPSS for Windows and other statistical procedures reported previously. RESULTS: (1) The mean of TBA of healthy subjects was (4.0 +/- 3.2) micromol/L. The TBA level of liver disease group is significantly higher than other group(P < 0.01). (2) The mean of TBA of patients with acute hepatitis was (167.2 +/- 132.4) micromol/L, the highest value was 449.5 micromol/L, it was significantly higher than other groups. TBA was a sensitive mark reflecting acute hepatic injury. (3) The sensitivity of TBA in patients with cirrhosis was 85.8%, higher than routine liver function tests. TBA is a valuable mark reflecting collateral circulation. (4) The sensitivity of TBA in mild chronic hepatitis was only 30.5%, much lower than ALT and TBIL (P < 0.01). (4) There was a relationship between the level of TBA and the severity of patients' condition, but the value of TBA for evaluating the severity was not as good as TBIL. CONCLUSION: The specificity of TBA is quite high, the sensitivity is moderate, TBA is valuable for the diagnosis of liver disease, especially for acute hepatitis and cirrhosis, but it's sensitivity for mild chronic hepatitis is only 30.5%, it is not as good as TBIL for evaluating the condition of patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the diagnostic value of total serum bile acid. METHOD: Clinical data from 913 cases was statistically analyzed with SPSS for Windows and other statistical procedures reported previously. RESULTS: (1) The mean of TBA of healthy subjects was (4.0 +/- 3.2) micromol/L. The TBA level of liver disease group is significantly higher than other group(P < 0.01). (2) The mean of TBA of patients with acute hepatitis was (167.2 +/- 132.4) micromol/L, the highest value was 449.5 micromol/L, it was significantly higher than other groups. TBA was a sensitive mark reflecting acute hepatic injury. (3) The sensitivity of TBA in patients with cirrhosis was 85.8%, higher than routine liver function tests. TBA is a valuable mark reflecting collateral circulation. (4) The sensitivity of TBA in mild chronic hepatitis was only 30.5%, much lower than ALT and TBIL (P < 0.01). (4) There was a relationship between the level of TBA and the severity of patients' condition, but the value of TBA for evaluating the severity was not as good as TBIL. CONCLUSION: The specificity of TBA is quite high, the sensitivity is moderate, TBA is valuable for the diagnosis of liver disease, especially for acute hepatitis and cirrhosis, but it's sensitivity for mild chronic hepatitis is only 30.5%, it is not as good as TBIL for evaluating the condition of patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the diagnostic value of total serum bile acid. METHOD: Clinical data from 913 cases was statistically analyzed with SPSS for Windows and other statistical procedures reported previously. RESULTS: (1) The mean of TBA of healthy subjects was (4.0 +/- 3.2) micromol/L. The TBA level of liver disease group is significantly higher than other group(P < 0.01). (2) The mean of TBA of patients with acute hepatitis was (167.2 +/- 132.4) micromol/L, the highest value was 449.5 micromol/L, it was significantly higher than other groups. TBA was a sensitive mark reflecting acute hepatic injury. (3) The sensitivity of TBA in patients with cirrhosis was 85.8%, higher than routine liver function tests. TBA is a valuable mark reflecting collateral circulation. (4) The sensitivity of TBA in mild chronic hepatitis was only 30.5%, much lower than ALT and TBIL (P < 0.01). (4) There was a relationship between the level of TBA and the severity of patients' condition, but the value of TBA for evaluating the severity was not as good as TBIL. CONCLUSION: The specificity of TBA is quite high, the sensitivity is moderate, TBA is valuable for the diagnosis of liver disease, especially for acute hepatitis and cirrhosis, but it's sensitivity for mild chronic hepatitis is only 30.5%, it is not as good as TBIL for evaluating the condition of patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Cirrhosis, Bile acid, Acute hepatitis, Hepatitis, Liver function

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The diagnostic value and limitations of total serum bile acid determined enzymatically]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens