2008China Medical HeraldRequires access

Clinical observation of TP and NP regimen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Xiaolong Cao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To observe the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and cisplatin(TP regime) versus navelbine cisplatin (NP regime) in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Methods: 60 cases with advanced breast cancer were randomly di- vided into TP programme(30 cases) and NP programme(30 cases). 60 cases were treated with vinorelbine(NVB 30 mg/m 2,on days 1,8) plus cisplatin(DDP 30 mg/m2 on days 1,2,3) or paclitaxel(75 mg/m2 on days 1,8,15) plus cisplatin (30 mg/m2 on day 1,2,3) every 4 weeks. Analysis were done by intention to treat. Results: For TP regiment: the total effective rate was 50%(15/30),TTP was 8.1 months,the median survival time was 16 months, and the rate of survival in one year was 56.7% (17/30).For NP regiment: the total effective rate of was 40.0%(12/30),TTP was 6.9 months,the median survival time was 15 months,and the rate of survival in one year was 43.3%(13/30).The main adverse drug reactions of two regiments were restraint of marrow and gastrointestinal reactions. Conclusion: Combination of NP and TP has good therapeutic effect for patients with anthracycline-resistant ABC. And the toxic reponses is tolerable. There is no significant difference between objective responses of two regimens.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To observe the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and cisplatin(TP regime) versus navelbine cisplatin (NP regime) in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Methods: 60 cases with advanced breast cancer were randomly di- vided into TP programme(30 cases) and NP programme(30 cases). 60 cases were treated with vinorelbine(NVB 30 mg/m 2,on days 1,8) plus cisplatin(DDP 30 mg/m2 on days 1,2,3) or paclitaxel(75 mg/m2 on days 1,8,15) plus cisplatin (30 mg/m2 on day 1,2,3) every 4 weeks. Analysis were done by intention to treat. Results: For TP regiment: the total effective rate was 50%(15/30),TTP was 8.1 months,the median survival time was 16 months, and the rate of survival in one year was 56.7% (17/30).For NP regiment: the total effective rate of was 40.0%(12/30),TTP was 6.9 months,the median survival time was 15 months,and the rate of survival in one year was 43.3%(13/30).The main adverse drug reactions of two regiments were restraint of marrow and gastrointestinal reactions. Conclusion: Combination of NP and TP has good therapeutic effect for patients with anthracycline-resistant ABC. And the toxic reponses is tolerable. There is no significant difference between objective responses of two regimens.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To observe the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and cisplatin(TP regime) versus navelbine cisplatin (NP regime) in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Methods: 60 cases with advanced breast cancer were randomly di- vided into TP programme(30 cases) and NP programme(30 cases). 60 cases were treated with vinorelbine(NVB 30 mg/m 2,on days 1,8) plus cisplatin(DDP 30 mg/m2 on days 1,2,3) or paclitaxel(75 mg/m2 on days 1,8,15) plus cisplatin (30 mg/m2 on day 1,2,3) every 4 weeks. Analysis were done by intention to treat. Results: For TP regiment: the total effective rate was 50%(15/30),TTP was 8.1 months,the median survival time was 16 months, and the rate of survival in one year was 56.7% (17/30).For NP regiment: the total effective rate of was 40.0%(12/30),TTP was 6.9 months,the median survival time was 15 months,and the rate of survival in one year was 43.3%(13/30).The main adverse drug reactions of two regiments were restraint of marrow and gastrointestinal reactions. Conclusion: Combination of NP and TP has good therapeutic effect for patients with anthracycline-resistant ABC. And the toxic reponses is tolerable. There is no significant difference between objective responses of two regimens.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cisplatin, Regimen, Internal medicine, Paclitaxel, Breast cancer, Gastroenterology, Chemotherapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical observation of TP and NP regimen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens