2006Journal of Gannan Medical UniversityRequires access

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs Paclitaxel plus cisplatin in treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Xie Chuang-hua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine plus cisplatin(NP)and paclitaxel plus cisplatin(TP)combinations in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:61patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive vinorelbine 25mg/m~2 on the 1stand 8th day by infusion and cisplatin 20mg/m~2 from the 1st to the 5th day(group NP,30 patients),or paclitaxel 135mg/m~2 on the 1st day by infusion and cisplatin 20mg/m~2 for 3~4 hours from the 2nd to 6th day(group TP,31 patients).Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks.Results:Objective response rate of 40.0% was observed in NP group versus 45.2% in TP group(P0.05).The 1-year survival rate was 36.7% in NP group and 41.9% in TP group(P0.05).The median survival duration was 10.7 months in NP group and 10.2 months in TP group.Myelosuppression was major dose-limiting toxicity.The incidence of neutropenia were 86.7% in NP group,and 67.7% in TP group.Phlebitis and nausea/vomiting were more severe in NP groug.By contrast,alopecia and peripheral neutrotoxicity/myalgia were more frequent in TP roup.Conclusion:The NP combination is as equally active and well tolerated as the TP combination in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine plus cisplatin(NP)and paclitaxel plus cisplatin(TP)combinations in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:61patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive vinorelbine 25mg/m~2 on the 1stand 8th day by infusion and cisplatin 20mg/m~2 from the 1st to the 5th day(group NP,30 patients),or paclitaxel 135mg/m~2 on the 1st day by infusion and cisplatin 20mg/m~2 for 3~4 hours from the 2nd to 6th day(group TP,31 patients).Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks.Results:Objective response rate of 40.0% was observed in NP group versus 45.2% in TP group(P0.05).The 1-year survival rate was 36.7% in NP group and 41.9% in TP group(P0.05).The median survival duration was 10.7 months in NP group and 10.2 months in TP group.Myelosuppression was major dose-limiting toxicity.The incidence of neutropenia were 86.7% in NP group,and 67.7% in TP group.Phlebitis and nausea/vomiting were more severe in NP groug.By contrast,alopecia and peripheral neutrotoxicity/myalgia were more frequent in TP roup.Conclusion:The NP combination is as equally active and well tolerated as the TP combination in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine plus cisplatin(NP)and paclitaxel plus cisplatin(TP)combinations in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:61patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive vinorelbine 25mg/m~2 on the 1stand 8th day by infusion and cisplatin 20mg/m~2 from the 1st to the 5th day(group NP,30 patients),or paclitaxel 135mg/m~2 on the 1st day by infusion and cisplatin 20mg/m~2 for 3~4 hours from the 2nd to 6th day(group TP,31 patients).Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks.Results:Objective response rate of 40.0% was observed in NP group versus 45.2% in TP group(P0.05).The 1-year survival rate was 36.7% in NP group and 41.9% in TP group(P0.05).The median survival duration was 10.7 months in NP group and 10.2 months in TP group.Myelosuppression was major dose-limiting toxicity.The incidence of neutropenia were 86.7% in NP group,and 67.7% in TP group.Phlebitis and nausea/vomiting were more severe in NP groug.By contrast,alopecia and peripheral neutrotoxicity/myalgia were more frequent in TP roup.Conclusion:The NP combination is as equally active and well tolerated as the TP combination in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Key concepts: Medicine, Vinorelbine, Cisplatin, Lung cancer, Internal medicine, Nausea, Neutropenia, Paclitaxel

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs Paclitaxel plus cisplatin in treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens