2014Journal of Bengbu Medical CollegeRequires access

Penehyelidine combined with tropisetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

DU Chang-huan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To explore the prophylactic effect of penehyelidine combined with tropisetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Sixty patients having received laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into three groups: tropisetron combined with dexamethasone group( group A),tropisetron group( group B) and physiological saline group( group C),with 20 cases in each. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was observed within 24 hours after the operation. Results: The visual analogus scales( VAS) score of nausea at T1-T4in group C was significantly higher than that in group A and group B( P 0. 01); the VAS score at T1and T2in group A was significantly lower than that in group B( P 0. 01); and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the VAS score at T3and T4( P 0. 05). The incidence of vomiting after awakening from 0 to 6,0 to 12 and 0 to 24 hours in group A and group B was significantly lower than that in group C( P 0. 01); and the incidences of vomiting in group A and B had no statistically significant difference( P 0. 05). Conclusions: The application of penehydidine combined with tropisetron can obviously reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and is more effective than using tropisetron alone. It is worth popularizing in clinical application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To explore the prophylactic effect of penehyelidine combined with tropisetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Sixty patients having received laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into three groups: tropisetron combined with dexamethasone group( group A),tropisetron group( group B) and physiological saline group( group C),with 20 cases in each. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was observed within 24 hours after the operation. Results: The visual analogus scales( VAS) score of nausea at T1-T4in group C was significantly higher than that in group A and group B( P 0. 01); the VAS score at T1and T2in group A was significantly lower than that in group B( P 0. 01); and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the VAS score at T3and T4( P 0. 05). The incidence of vomiting after awakening from 0 to 6,0 to 12 and 0 to 24 hours in group A and group B was significantly lower than that in group C( P 0. 01); and the incidences of vomiting in group A and B had no statistically significant difference( P 0. 05). Conclusions: The application of penehydidine combined with tropisetron can obviously reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and is more effective than using tropisetron alone. It is worth popularizing in clinical application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To explore the prophylactic effect of penehyelidine combined with tropisetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Sixty patients having received laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into three groups: tropisetron combined with dexamethasone group( group A),tropisetron group( group B) and physiological saline group( group C),with 20 cases in each. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was observed within 24 hours after the operation. Results: The visual analogus scales( VAS) score of nausea at T1-T4in group C was significantly higher than that in group A and group B( P 0. 01); the VAS score at T1and T2in group A was significantly lower than that in group B( P 0. 01); and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the VAS score at T3and T4( P 0. 05). The incidence of vomiting after awakening from 0 to 6,0 to 12 and 0 to 24 hours in group A and group B was significantly lower than that in group C( P 0. 01); and the incidences of vomiting in group A and B had no statistically significant difference( P 0. 05). Conclusions: The application of penehydidine combined with tropisetron can obviously reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and is more effective than using tropisetron alone. It is worth popularizing in clinical application.

Key concepts: Tropisetron, Medicine, Vomiting, Nausea, Anesthesia, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Incidence (geometry), Postoperative nausea and vomiting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Penehyelidine combined with tropisetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens