2012Jilin yixueRequires access

Pathological analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of biopsy by colposcopy and loop electrical excision procedure

Yang Chun-mei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the biopsy by colposcopy and loop electrical excision procedure(LEEP) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,and to explore the value in the diagnosis and treatment.Method Biopsy by colposcopy and biopsy after LEEP were analyzed retrospectively in 155 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,and to study the differences of pathological diagnosis results.Results Coincidence rate of pathological results CIN I,CIN II,CIN III between cervical biopsy by colposcopy and LEEP was 46.3%,70.8%,82.5%,respectively,and the total coincidence rate was 63.2%,25 cases upgraded(16.1%),32 cases downgraded(20.6%),the missed diagnosis rate of cervical cancer was 3.2%.Conclusion Cervical biopsy by colposcopy is a simple,effective method in the diagnosis of CIN,but there are some limitations.LEEP plays a diagnostic and therapeutic role based on the biopsy by colposcopy,and can compensate the deficiency of biopsy by colposcopy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the biopsy by colposcopy and loop electrical excision procedure(LEEP) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,and to explore the value in the diagnosis and treatment.Method Biopsy by colposcopy and biopsy after LEEP were analyzed retrospectively in 155 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,and to study the differences of pathological diagnosis results.Results Coincidence rate of pathological results CIN I,CIN II,CIN III between cervical biopsy by colposcopy and LEEP was 46.3%,70.8%,82.5%,respectively,and the total coincidence rate was 63.2%,25 cases upgraded(16.1%),32 cases downgraded(20.6%),the missed diagnosis rate of cervical cancer was 3.2%.Conclusion Cervical biopsy by colposcopy is a simple,effective method in the diagnosis of CIN,but there are some limitations.LEEP plays a diagnostic and therapeutic role based on the biopsy by colposcopy,and can compensate the deficiency of biopsy by colposcopy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the biopsy by colposcopy and loop electrical excision procedure(LEEP) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,and to explore the value in the diagnosis and treatment.Method Biopsy by colposcopy and biopsy after LEEP were analyzed retrospectively in 155 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,and to study the differences of pathological diagnosis results.Results Coincidence rate of pathological results CIN I,CIN II,CIN III between cervical biopsy by colposcopy and LEEP was 46.3%,70.8%,82.5%,respectively,and the total coincidence rate was 63.2%,25 cases upgraded(16.1%),32 cases downgraded(20.6%),the missed diagnosis rate of cervical cancer was 3.2%.Conclusion Cervical biopsy by colposcopy is a simple,effective method in the diagnosis of CIN,but there are some limitations.LEEP plays a diagnostic and therapeutic role based on the biopsy by colposcopy,and can compensate the deficiency of biopsy by colposcopy.

Key concepts: Colposcopy, Medicine, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Biopsy, Loop electrosurgical excision procedure, Pathological, Intraepithelial neoplasia, Cervical cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pathological analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of biopsy by colposcopy and loop electrical excision procedure — Research Paper | ScholarLens