2006•Unpublished venueRequires access

Study on the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria

Duo Gao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules versus cetirizine capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria.Methods: A Multicenter double-blind double-dummy comparative study of the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules versus cetirizine capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria(phase Ⅱ).Results: 136 cases were accomplished,67 cases in tset group and 69 cases in control group.The effective rate of test group was 80.597%,that of control group was 71.014%.The two groups were not significantly different,P 0.05.The incidence of adverse drug reaction in test group was 11.429%,that of control group was 18.310%.The two groups were not significantly different,P 0.05.Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria correspond to cetirizine capsules.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules versus cetirizine capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria.Methods: A Multicenter double-blind double-dummy comparative study of the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules versus cetirizine capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria(phase Ⅱ).Results: 136 cases were accomplished,67 cases in tset group and 69 cases in control group.The effective rate of test group was 80.597%,that of control group was 71.014%.The two groups were not significantly different,P 0.05.The incidence of adverse drug reaction in test group was 11.429%,that of control group was 18.310%.The two groups were not significantly different,P 0.05.Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria correspond to cetirizine capsules.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules versus cetirizine capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria.Methods: A Multicenter double-blind double-dummy comparative study of the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules versus cetirizine capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria(phase Ⅱ).Results: 136 cases were accomplished,67 cases in tset group and 69 cases in control group.The effective rate of test group was 80.597%,that of control group was 71.014%.The two groups were not significantly different,P 0.05.The incidence of adverse drug reaction in test group was 11.429%,that of control group was 18.310%.The two groups were not significantly different,P 0.05.Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria correspond to cetirizine capsules.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cetirizine, Fexofenadine, Chronic idiopathic urticaria, Incidence (geometry), Adverse effect, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride capsules in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria — Research Paper | ScholarLens