2010•Strait Pharmaceutical JournalRequires access

Domestic and imported ceftazidime treatment of children with bacterial lower respiratory tract infections cost-effectiveness analysis

Zhu Wan-zhen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To domestic and imported ceftazidime treatment of children with bacterial lower respiratory tract infections a cost-effectiveness analysis.METHODS 136 cases of hospitalized patients who suffered from the children bacterial lower-respiratory infections and only be treated with ceftazidime from 2008.9~2009.10 in our hospital were retrospectirvely analyzed.According to medicine,They were divided into A,B groups,A group given ceftazidime(Domestic) 60mg/(kg·d),sub-2 intravenous infusion;B group given ceftazidime(Import) 60mg/(kg·d),sub-2 intravenous infusion,two groups of treatment are 7 days,two groups were calculated after treatment of the bacterial clearance rate,incidence of adverse reactions,two groups of treatment efficiency and the total cost to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio.RESULTS After treatment A,B the cost of drug treatment groups were: A group of 236.4 yuan,B group 982.5 yuan,compared between the two groups there were significant differences(P0.05);treatment efficiency are as follows:91.30%,94.03%,A,B groups of the bacterial clearance rates were as follows: 86.36%,90.70%,two groups of adverse reaction rates were as follows:5.80%,2.99%,between the two groups did not differ significantly(P0.05);two sets of cost-effectiveness ratio are as follows: 2.59,10.45.CONCLUSION The cost of domestic Ceftazidime-Ceftazidime effectiveness ratio is better than imports,in order to better treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To domestic and imported ceftazidime treatment of children with bacterial lower respiratory tract infections a cost-effectiveness analysis.METHODS 136 cases of hospitalized patients who suffered from the children bacterial lower-respiratory infections and only be treated with ceftazidime from 2008.9~2009.10 in our hospital were retrospectirvely analyzed.According to medicine,They were divided into A,B groups,A group given ceftazidime(Domestic) 60mg/(kg·d),sub-2 intravenous infusion;B group given ceftazidime(Import) 60mg/(kg·d),sub-2 intravenous infusion,two groups of treatment are 7 days,two groups were calculated after treatment of the bacterial clearance rate,incidence of adverse reactions,two groups of treatment efficiency and the total cost to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio.RESULTS After treatment A,B the cost of drug treatment groups were: A group of 236.4 yuan,B group 982.5 yuan,compared between the two groups there were significant differences(P0.05);treatment efficiency are as follows:91.30%,94.03%,A,B groups of the bacterial clearance rates were as follows: 86.36%,90.70%,two groups of adverse reaction rates were as follows:5.80%,2.99%,between the two groups did not differ significantly(P0.05);two sets of cost-effectiveness ratio are as follows: 2.59,10.45.CONCLUSION The cost of domestic Ceftazidime-Ceftazidime effectiveness ratio is better than imports,in order to better treatment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To domestic and imported ceftazidime treatment of children with bacterial lower respiratory tract infections a cost-effectiveness analysis.METHODS 136 cases of hospitalized patients who suffered from the children bacterial lower-respiratory infections and only be treated with ceftazidime from 2008.9~2009.10 in our hospital were retrospectirvely analyzed.According to medicine,They were divided into A,B groups,A group given ceftazidime(Domestic) 60mg/(kg·d),sub-2 intravenous infusion;B group given ceftazidime(Import) 60mg/(kg·d),sub-2 intravenous infusion,two groups of treatment are 7 days,two groups were calculated after treatment of the bacterial clearance rate,incidence of adverse reactions,two groups of treatment efficiency and the total cost to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio.RESULTS After treatment A,B the cost of drug treatment groups were: A group of 236.4 yuan,B group 982.5 yuan,compared between the two groups there were significant differences(P0.05);treatment efficiency are as follows:91.30%,94.03%,A,B groups of the bacterial clearance rates were as follows: 86.36%,90.70%,two groups of adverse reaction rates were as follows:5.80%,2.99%,between the two groups did not differ significantly(P0.05);two sets of cost-effectiveness ratio are as follows: 2.59,10.45.CONCLUSION The cost of domestic Ceftazidime-Ceftazidime effectiveness ratio is better than imports,in order to better treatment.

Key concepts: Ceftazidime, Medicine, Incidence (geometry), Respiratory tract infections, Group B, Internal medicine, Respiratory tract, Group A

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Domestic and imported ceftazidime treatment of children with bacterial lower respiratory tract infections cost-effectiveness analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens