2006•Chongqing yixueRequires access

Cost-effectiveness analysis of domestic and imported cefepime in treatment of acute urinary infections

Guanghui Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness between domestic and imported cefepime in the treatment of acute uri- nary infections.Methods One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups.There were 61 cases in domestic group(A group)and 61 cases in imported group(B group).Principle of pharmacoeconomics was adopted to analyze cost-effective- ness.Results The effective rates of A group and B group were 98.36% and 96.72%,the bacterial eradiction rate both was 100%, and the incidence of adverse reaction was 6.56% and 10.47% respectively.The difference was not significant between two groups (P>0.05).The cost-effectiveness ratio(C/E)were 4 059.64 and 4 625.45 respectively.The cost for every one unit increment of effectiveness for B group was RMB 29 309.76 yuan more than that of A group.Conclnsion Taking everything into consideration, the economical effects of domestic cefepime was better than imported cefepime in the treatment of acute urinary infections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness between domestic and imported cefepime in the treatment of acute uri- nary infections.Methods One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups.There were 61 cases in domestic group(A group)and 61 cases in imported group(B group).Principle of pharmacoeconomics was adopted to analyze cost-effective- ness.Results The effective rates of A group and B group were 98.36% and 96.72%,the bacterial eradiction rate both was 100%, and the incidence of adverse reaction was 6.56% and 10.47% respectively.The difference was not significant between two groups (P>0.05).The cost-effectiveness ratio(C/E)were 4 059.64 and 4 625.45 respectively.The cost for every one unit increment of effectiveness for B group was RMB 29 309.76 yuan more than that of A group.Conclnsion Taking everything into consideration, the economical effects of domestic cefepime was better than imported cefepime in the treatment of acute urinary infections.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness between domestic and imported cefepime in the treatment of acute uri- nary infections.Methods One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups.There were 61 cases in domestic group(A group)and 61 cases in imported group(B group).Principle of pharmacoeconomics was adopted to analyze cost-effective- ness.Results The effective rates of A group and B group were 98.36% and 96.72%,the bacterial eradiction rate both was 100%, and the incidence of adverse reaction was 6.56% and 10.47% respectively.The difference was not significant between two groups (P>0.05).The cost-effectiveness ratio(C/E)were 4 059.64 and 4 625.45 respectively.The cost for every one unit increment of effectiveness for B group was RMB 29 309.76 yuan more than that of A group.Conclnsion Taking everything into consideration, the economical effects of domestic cefepime was better than imported cefepime in the treatment of acute urinary infections.

Key concepts: Cefepime, Medicine, Pharmacoeconomics, Incidence (geometry), Group B, Urinary system, Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost-effectiveness analysis of domestic and imported cefepime in treatment of acute urinary infections — Research Paper | ScholarLens