Cost-effectiveness analysis of domestic and imported cefepime in treatment of acute urinary infections
Guanghui Chen
Abstract
Guanghui Chen
Abstract
Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness between domestic and imported cefepime in the treatment of acute uri- nary infections.Methods One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups.There were 61 cases in domestic group(A group)and 61 cases in imported group(B group).Principle of pharmacoeconomics was adopted to analyze cost-effective- ness.Results The effective rates of A group and B group were 98.36% and 96.72%,the bacterial eradiction rate both was 100%, and the incidence of adverse reaction was 6.56% and 10.47% respectively.The difference was not significant between two groups (P>0.05).The cost-effectiveness ratio(C/E)were 4 059.64 and 4 625.45 respectively.The cost for every one unit increment of effectiveness for B group was RMB 29 309.76 yuan more than that of A group.Conclnsion Taking everything into consideration, the economical effects of domestic cefepime was better than imported cefepime in the treatment of acute urinary infections.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness between domestic and imported cefepime in the treatment of acute uri- nary infections.Methods One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups.There were 61 cases in domestic group(A group)and 61 cases in imported group(B group).Principle of pharmacoeconomics was adopted to analyze cost-effective- ness.Results The effective rates of A group and B group were 98.36% and 96.72%,the bacterial eradiction rate both was 100%, and the incidence of adverse reaction was 6.56% and 10.47% respectively.The difference was not significant between two groups (P>0.05).The cost-effectiveness ratio(C/E)were 4 059.64 and 4 625.45 respectively.The cost for every one unit increment of effectiveness for B group was RMB 29 309.76 yuan more than that of A group.Conclnsion Taking everything into consideration, the economical effects of domestic cefepime was better than imported cefepime in the treatment of acute urinary infections.
Key concepts: Cefepime, Medicine, Pharmacoeconomics, Incidence (geometry), Group B, Urinary system, Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine