2008•Journal of Pediatric PharmacyRequires access

Cost-effectiveness analysis of three therapeutic schemes for lower respiratory tract infection in children

Lin Su-mei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the curative efficacies and cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic schemes for lower respiratory tract infection in children.Methods: 178 patients with lower respiratory tract infection in children were divided into group A,group B and group C,and given respectively amoxicillin sodium-clavulanate potassium,mezlocillin and ceftazidime for treatment.The therapeutic effects were monitored and the cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted.Results: The medication costs of group A,B and C were 408.96 yuan,300.24 yuan and 259.20 yuan respectively and the total effective rates of the three groups were 91.53%,91.38% and 90.16%.The cost-effectiveness rates(C/E) of the three groups were 446.80,328.56,287.49 and the incremental cost-effectiveness rates(ΔC/ΔE) of group A and B were 10,931.39,3,363.93.Conclusions: Group C(Ceftazidime treatment group) has the best cost-effectiveness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the curative efficacies and cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic schemes for lower respiratory tract infection in children.Methods: 178 patients with lower respiratory tract infection in children were divided into group A,group B and group C,and given respectively amoxicillin sodium-clavulanate potassium,mezlocillin and ceftazidime for treatment.The therapeutic effects were monitored and the cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted.Results: The medication costs of group A,B and C were 408.96 yuan,300.24 yuan and 259.20 yuan respectively and the total effective rates of the three groups were 91.53%,91.38% and 90.16%.The cost-effectiveness rates(C/E) of the three groups were 446.80,328.56,287.49 and the incremental cost-effectiveness rates(ΔC/ΔE) of group A and B were 10,931.39,3,363.93.Conclusions: Group C(Ceftazidime treatment group) has the best cost-effectiveness.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the curative efficacies and cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic schemes for lower respiratory tract infection in children.Methods: 178 patients with lower respiratory tract infection in children were divided into group A,group B and group C,and given respectively amoxicillin sodium-clavulanate potassium,mezlocillin and ceftazidime for treatment.The therapeutic effects were monitored and the cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted.Results: The medication costs of group A,B and C were 408.96 yuan,300.24 yuan and 259.20 yuan respectively and the total effective rates of the three groups were 91.53%,91.38% and 90.16%.The cost-effectiveness rates(C/E) of the three groups were 446.80,328.56,287.49 and the incremental cost-effectiveness rates(ΔC/ΔE) of group A and B were 10,931.39,3,363.93.Conclusions: Group C(Ceftazidime treatment group) has the best cost-effectiveness.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ceftazidime, Respiratory tract infections, Amoxicillin, Internal medicine, Lower respiratory tract infection, Respiratory tract, Group B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost-effectiveness analysis of three therapeutic schemes for lower respiratory tract infection in children — Research Paper | ScholarLens