Therapeutic selection of auto-continuous positive airway pressure and Bi-level positive airway pressure on the obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome
Meng Kun
Abstract
Meng Kun
Abstract
Objective To explore the application of auto-positive airway pressure ( Auto-CPAP ) and bi-level positive airway pressure ( Bi-PAP) on the patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome ( OS-AHS). Methods 120 OSAHS patients were divided into two groups,namely 60 with AHI≤60 and M SaO2≥80% in A group and 60 with AHI 60 and M SaO2 80% in B group. All patients received Auto-CPAP one day and Bi-PAP therapy the next day. The changes of PSG parameters were observed. Results The therapy effects of Auto-CPAP and Bi-PAP in A group has no significance. The therapy effects of Bi-PAP were much better than Auto-CPAP in B group. The effects of treatment were manifested as sleep efficiency ( SE) ,number of WASO ( wake after sleep onset) ,time of NREM I + II over total sleep time,time of III + IV and REM over total sleep time. The apnea-hypopnea index ( AHI) ,night time mean SaO2( M SaO2) and nighttime the lowest SaO2 ( L SaO2) have no significance. Con-clusion For severe OSAHS patients,when AHI≤60 and M SaO2≥80% ,Auto-CPAP should be used,and when AHI 60 and M SaO2 80% ,Bi-PAP should be selected for therapy.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To explore the application of auto-positive airway pressure ( Auto-CPAP ) and bi-level positive airway pressure ( Bi-PAP) on the patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome ( OS-AHS). Methods 120 OSAHS patients were divided into two groups,namely 60 with AHI≤60 and M SaO2≥80% in A group and 60 with AHI 60 and M SaO2 80% in B group. All patients received Auto-CPAP one day and Bi-PAP therapy the next day. The changes of PSG parameters were observed. Results The therapy effects of Auto-CPAP and Bi-PAP in A group has no significance. The therapy effects of Bi-PAP were much better than Auto-CPAP in B group. The effects of treatment were manifested as sleep efficiency ( SE) ,number of WASO ( wake after sleep onset) ,time of NREM I + II over total sleep time,time of III + IV and REM over total sleep time. The apnea-hypopnea index ( AHI) ,night time mean SaO2( M SaO2) and nighttime the lowest SaO2 ( L SaO2) have no significance. Con-clusion For severe OSAHS patients,when AHI≤60 and M SaO2≥80% ,Auto-CPAP should be used,and when AHI 60 and M SaO2 80% ,Bi-PAP should be selected for therapy.
Key concepts: Medicine, Continuous positive airway pressure, Positive airway pressure, Obstructive sleep apnea, Anesthesia, Hypopnea, Non-rapid eye movement sleep, Apnea