2004Chinese New Drugs JournalRequires access

Comparison of the efficacy of cefdinir and cefteram in treatment of acute bacterial urinary tract infections

Yong Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of cefdinir and cefteram in treatment of acute bacterial urinary tract infections. Methods: 26 patients with mild to moderate acute pyelonephritis or acute cystitis were randomly and equally divided to receive cefdinir or cefteram, in a dose of 100mg 3 times daily for 7d in both groups. Results:The bacterial eradication rate was 100.0% for both groups,the cure rate was 76.9% for both groups,and the total effective rate was 100.0% for cefdinir group and 92.3% for cefteram group. The incidence of ADRs was 7.7% for both groups. No significant difference was observed in all the parameters between groups. Conclusion: Cefdinir is safe and effective in treatment of mild to moderate acute bacterial urinary infections caused by bacteria sensitive to cefdinir.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of cefdinir and cefteram in treatment of acute bacterial urinary tract infections. Methods: 26 patients with mild to moderate acute pyelonephritis or acute cystitis were randomly and equally divided to receive cefdinir or cefteram, in a dose of 100mg 3 times daily for 7d in both groups. Results:The bacterial eradication rate was 100.0% for both groups,the cure rate was 76.9% for both groups,and the total effective rate was 100.0% for cefdinir group and 92.3% for cefteram group. The incidence of ADRs was 7.7% for both groups. No significant difference was observed in all the parameters between groups. Conclusion: Cefdinir is safe and effective in treatment of mild to moderate acute bacterial urinary infections caused by bacteria sensitive to cefdinir.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of cefdinir and cefteram in treatment of acute bacterial urinary tract infections. Methods: 26 patients with mild to moderate acute pyelonephritis or acute cystitis were randomly and equally divided to receive cefdinir or cefteram, in a dose of 100mg 3 times daily for 7d in both groups. Results:The bacterial eradication rate was 100.0% for both groups,the cure rate was 76.9% for both groups,and the total effective rate was 100.0% for cefdinir group and 92.3% for cefteram group. The incidence of ADRs was 7.7% for both groups. No significant difference was observed in all the parameters between groups. Conclusion: Cefdinir is safe and effective in treatment of mild to moderate acute bacterial urinary infections caused by bacteria sensitive to cefdinir.

Key concepts: Cefdinir, Medicine, Urinary system, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Significant difference, Cure rate, Incidence (geometry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the efficacy of cefdinir and cefteram in treatment of acute bacterial urinary tract infections — Research Paper | ScholarLens