2012Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Cost-effectiveness analysis of three common long-term calcium channel blockers in treatment of mild-to-moderate primary hypertension

Yanqiu Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three common long-term calcium channel blockers in treatment of mild-to-moderate primary hypertension.METHODS One hundred and eighty mild-to-moderate primary hypertension patients in the clinic were randomized into three groups,60 for each group,and respectivdy oral nifedipine 30 mg,felodipine 5 mg and amlodipine 5 mg at once daily,followed for 8 weeks. The therapeutic effects were observed and were evaluated by cost-effectiveness analysis.RESULTS The clinical efficacies of the nifedipine group,the felodipine group and the amlodipine group were 90%,93%and 95%, respectively,with no significant differences in the three groups(P 0.05).The cost-effectiveness ratios of the nifedipine group,the felodipine group and the amlodipine group were 11.54,10.35 and 11.28,respectively.To make the felodipine group as the baseline,the incremental cost-incremental effectiveness ratios of the nifedipine group and the amlodipine group were 22.06 and 62.59.CONCLUSION The cost-effectiveness of felodipine is superior to nifedipine and amlodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate primary hypertension.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three common long-term calcium channel blockers in treatment of mild-to-moderate primary hypertension.METHODS One hundred and eighty mild-to-moderate primary hypertension patients in the clinic were randomized into three groups,60 for each group,and respectivdy oral nifedipine 30 mg,felodipine 5 mg and amlodipine 5 mg at once daily,followed for 8 weeks. The therapeutic effects were observed and were evaluated by cost-effectiveness analysis.RESULTS The clinical efficacies of the nifedipine group,the felodipine group and the amlodipine group were 90%,93%and 95%, respectively,with no significant differences in the three groups(P 0.05).The cost-effectiveness ratios of the nifedipine group,the felodipine group and the amlodipine group were 11.54,10.35 and 11.28,respectively.To make the felodipine group as the baseline,the incremental cost-incremental effectiveness ratios of the nifedipine group and the amlodipine group were 22.06 and 62.59.CONCLUSION The cost-effectiveness of felodipine is superior to nifedipine and amlodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate primary hypertension.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three common long-term calcium channel blockers in treatment of mild-to-moderate primary hypertension.METHODS One hundred and eighty mild-to-moderate primary hypertension patients in the clinic were randomized into three groups,60 for each group,and respectivdy oral nifedipine 30 mg,felodipine 5 mg and amlodipine 5 mg at once daily,followed for 8 weeks. The therapeutic effects were observed and were evaluated by cost-effectiveness analysis.RESULTS The clinical efficacies of the nifedipine group,the felodipine group and the amlodipine group were 90%,93%and 95%, respectively,with no significant differences in the three groups(P 0.05).The cost-effectiveness ratios of the nifedipine group,the felodipine group and the amlodipine group were 11.54,10.35 and 11.28,respectively.To make the felodipine group as the baseline,the incremental cost-incremental effectiveness ratios of the nifedipine group and the amlodipine group were 22.06 and 62.59.CONCLUSION The cost-effectiveness of felodipine is superior to nifedipine and amlodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate primary hypertension.

Key concepts: Felodipine, Amlodipine, Nifedipine, Medicine, Extended release, Randomized controlled trial, Cost effectiveness, Calcium channel

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost-effectiveness analysis of three common long-term calcium channel blockers in treatment of mild-to-moderate primary hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens