2002Yiyao daobaoRequires access

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Amlodipine, Felodipine and Slow-release Nifedipine in the Treatment of Hypertension

Hui Duan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the economic benefit of amlodipine, felodipine and slow release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension. Method:152 patients with hypertension selected according to the literature served as subjects of the study. Amlodipine (5 mg, PO, qd), felodipine(5 mg, PO, qd) and slow release nifedipine (30 mg, PO, qd) were used in the treatment of 53, 50, 49 patients, respectively, for 2 consecutive weeks. Relevant situations were evaluated by a pharmacoeconomic cost-effectiveness analysis. Results:The rates of excellent effectiveness of amlodipine, felodipine and slow release nifedipine were 47.17%, 36.00% and 30.61%, respectively, and amlodipine had the lowest cost effectiveness ratio. Conclusion:Amlodipine was found to be superior to felodipine and slow release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension. It is a drug with a fairly good cost effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the economic benefit of amlodipine, felodipine and slow release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension. Method:152 patients with hypertension selected according to the literature served as subjects of the study. Amlodipine (5 mg, PO, qd), felodipine(5 mg, PO, qd) and slow release nifedipine (30 mg, PO, qd) were used in the treatment of 53, 50, 49 patients, respectively, for 2 consecutive weeks. Relevant situations were evaluated by a pharmacoeconomic cost-effectiveness analysis. Results:The rates of excellent effectiveness of amlodipine, felodipine and slow release nifedipine were 47.17%, 36.00% and 30.61%, respectively, and amlodipine had the lowest cost effectiveness ratio. Conclusion:Amlodipine was found to be superior to felodipine and slow release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension. It is a drug with a fairly good cost effect.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the economic benefit of amlodipine, felodipine and slow release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension. Method:152 patients with hypertension selected according to the literature served as subjects of the study. Amlodipine (5 mg, PO, qd), felodipine(5 mg, PO, qd) and slow release nifedipine (30 mg, PO, qd) were used in the treatment of 53, 50, 49 patients, respectively, for 2 consecutive weeks. Relevant situations were evaluated by a pharmacoeconomic cost-effectiveness analysis. Results:The rates of excellent effectiveness of amlodipine, felodipine and slow release nifedipine were 47.17%, 36.00% and 30.61%, respectively, and amlodipine had the lowest cost effectiveness ratio. Conclusion:Amlodipine was found to be superior to felodipine and slow release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension. It is a drug with a fairly good cost effect.

Key concepts: Felodipine, Amlodipine, Nifedipine, Medicine, Extended release, Pharmacology, Internal medicine, Blood pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Amlodipine, Felodipine and Slow-release Nifedipine in the Treatment of Hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens