2004Hebei faxueRequires access

Explore of Anti-monopoly of Administrative

Mengmeng Tian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Compared with economic monopoly, administrative monopoly is more adverse in China, which negative effect prevent from the development of the socialist market economy. Consequently, China, a party to WTO, cannot fulfill its member's duty. So, an effective anti-monopoly law is necessary to regulate administrative monopoly .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Compared with economic monopoly, administrative monopoly is more adverse in China, which negative effect prevent from the development of the socialist market economy. Consequently, China, a party to WTO, cannot fulfill its member's duty. So, an effective anti-monopoly law is necessary to regulate administrative monopoly .

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Compared with economic monopoly, administrative monopoly is more adverse in China, which negative effect prevent from the development of the socialist market economy. Consequently, China, a party to WTO, cannot fulfill its member's duty. So, an effective anti-monopoly law is necessary to regulate administrative monopoly .

Key concepts: Monopoly, China, Duty, Natural monopoly, Business, Administrative law, Market economy, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Explore of Anti-monopoly of Administrative — Research Paper | ScholarLens