The clinical efficacy comparison of conserving therapy and modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of early breast cancer

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of conserving therapy and modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of the early breast cancer.Methods: 56 cases of breast cancer patients were randomly divided into treatment group and control group,each 28 patients,and the control group was treated with modified radical mastectomy,the treatment group was used breast-conserving surgery alone,compared the surgical treatment efficacy according to the different surgical methods from January 2008 to October 2010 in our hospital.Results: Compared with the modified radical mastectomy,breast-conserving surgery group had short operation time,less bleeding,shorter hospital stay,postoperative complication rate,and the cosmetic results comparing that of the two group,the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group,there were statistically significant between the two groups(P0.05).The postoperative recurrence rate of overall survival and disease-free surviva and follow-up 1 year,3 years,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion: In comparison with modified radical mastectomy,breast conserving surgery has a short operation time,less bleeding,shorter hospital stay,postoperative complication rate,good cosmetic results and benefits,should be popularized and applied.And the clinical doctors should be based on the specific circumstances of breast cancer patients choose the appropriate surgical approach.