2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative Study on the Different Organization of Genomic DNA Extraction in Pinus armandi Franch

Xie Dong-me

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It is the critical first step how to obtain high-quality DNA in molecular biology research.In this paper,their genomic DNA from stem,leaves and endosperm of Pinus armandi Franch were extracted using five methods,which were the classical CTAB method,modified CTAB method,simple CTAB method,SDS micro-extraction method and Zigenhagen method.Then,the extracted DNAs were analyzed by ultraviolet spectrophotometer,agarose gel electrophoresis and standard deviation and standard error of arithmetic mean.The results showed:1The modified CTAB method was appropriate for leaves genomic DNA extraction,whose yield was moderate,changes of standard deviation and standard error were lower,and DNA quality was better and stable;2In stem genomic DNA extraction,the yield and the purity of DNA from the Zigenhagen method were highest and its changes of standard deviation and standard error were lowest.Its DNA quality was obviously better and stable;3For endosperm,the yield and the purity of DNA from simple CTAB method was highest,and its changes of standard deviation and standard error were lowest,which indicated that the DNA quality from simple CTAB method was obviously better and stable.Therefore,different methods should be used to extract genomic DNA in the different tissue of one and the same plant.To obtain the best result,the method of DNA extraction need to be explored in practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is the critical first step how to obtain high-quality DNA in molecular biology research.In this paper,their genomic DNA from stem,leaves and endosperm of Pinus armandi Franch were extracted using five methods,which were the classical CTAB method,modified CTAB method,simple CTAB method,SDS micro-extraction method and Zigenhagen method.Then,the extracted DNAs were analyzed by ultraviolet spectrophotometer,agarose gel electrophoresis and standard deviation and standard error of arithmetic mean.The results showed:1The modified CTAB method was appropriate for leaves genomic DNA extraction,whose yield was moderate,changes of standard deviation and standard error were lower,and DNA quality was better and stable;2In stem genomic DNA extraction,the yield and the purity of DNA from the Zigenhagen method were highest and its changes of standard deviation and standard error were lowest.Its DNA quality was obviously better and stable;3For endosperm,the yield and the purity of DNA from simple CTAB method was highest,and its changes of standard deviation and standard error were lowest,which indicated that the DNA quality from simple CTAB method was obviously better and stable.Therefore,different methods should be used to extract genomic DNA in the different tissue of one and the same plant.To obtain the best result,the method of DNA extraction need to be explored in practice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is the critical first step how to obtain high-quality DNA in molecular biology research.In this paper,their genomic DNA from stem,leaves and endosperm of Pinus armandi Franch were extracted using five methods,which were the classical CTAB method,modified CTAB method,simple CTAB method,SDS micro-extraction method and Zigenhagen method.Then,the extracted DNAs were analyzed by ultraviolet spectrophotometer,agarose gel electrophoresis and standard deviation and standard error of arithmetic mean.The results showed:1The modified CTAB method was appropriate for leaves genomic DNA extraction,whose yield was moderate,changes of standard deviation and standard error were lower,and DNA quality was better and stable;2In stem genomic DNA extraction,the yield and the purity of DNA from the Zigenhagen method were highest and its changes of standard deviation and standard error were lowest.Its DNA quality was obviously better and stable;3For endosperm,the yield and the purity of DNA from simple CTAB method was highest,and its changes of standard deviation and standard error were lowest,which indicated that the DNA quality from simple CTAB method was obviously better and stable.Therefore,different methods should be used to extract genomic DNA in the different tissue of one and the same plant.To obtain the best result,the method of DNA extraction need to be explored in practice.

Key concepts: genomic DNA, Endosperm, DNA extraction, DNA, Chromatography, Agarose gel electrophoresis, Extraction (chemistry), Agarose

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Study on the Different Organization of Genomic DNA Extraction in Pinus armandi Franch — Research Paper | ScholarLens