2006Chongqing yixueRequires access

Application comparison of two kinds of clavicular hook plates

Wu Shuhong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of two different kinds of clavicular hook plates for acromioclavicular joint dislocation.Mthhods Thirty-seven patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation were treated with two different collarbone hook steel plates.According to Tossy classification system,all patients belonged to Ⅲ.There were 26 cases used L to internal fix,11 cases used U-type.Results All patients were followed up for 9-29 months(average 18 months).The results were evaluated with Karlsson classification,26 cases in the group of L-type clavicular hook plates internal fixation were graded as A,3B;in U group,5 cases were graded as A,6B,1C.Conclusion Two kinds of clavicular hook plates are believed to be a ridid fixation method for treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation,but using L-type clavicular hook plates has the advantages such as less trauma,simpler operation,safety,shorter small incision,and rapid rehabilitation.It is a satisfactory method to treat the acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of two different kinds of clavicular hook plates for acromioclavicular joint dislocation.Mthhods Thirty-seven patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation were treated with two different collarbone hook steel plates.According to Tossy classification system,all patients belonged to Ⅲ.There were 26 cases used L to internal fix,11 cases used U-type.Results All patients were followed up for 9-29 months(average 18 months).The results were evaluated with Karlsson classification,26 cases in the group of L-type clavicular hook plates internal fixation were graded as A,3B;in U group,5 cases were graded as A,6B,1C.Conclusion Two kinds of clavicular hook plates are believed to be a ridid fixation method for treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation,but using L-type clavicular hook plates has the advantages such as less trauma,simpler operation,safety,shorter small incision,and rapid rehabilitation.It is a satisfactory method to treat the acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of two different kinds of clavicular hook plates for acromioclavicular joint dislocation.Mthhods Thirty-seven patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation were treated with two different collarbone hook steel plates.According to Tossy classification system,all patients belonged to Ⅲ.There were 26 cases used L to internal fix,11 cases used U-type.Results All patients were followed up for 9-29 months(average 18 months).The results were evaluated with Karlsson classification,26 cases in the group of L-type clavicular hook plates internal fixation were graded as A,3B;in U group,5 cases were graded as A,6B,1C.Conclusion Two kinds of clavicular hook plates are believed to be a ridid fixation method for treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation,but using L-type clavicular hook plates has the advantages such as less trauma,simpler operation,safety,shorter small incision,and rapid rehabilitation.It is a satisfactory method to treat the acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Key concepts: Acromioclavicular joint, Medicine, Hook, Surgery, Internal fixation, Fixation (population genetics), Orthodontics, Dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application comparison of two kinds of clavicular hook plates — Research Paper | ScholarLens