A Discussion on Dispute Settlement and Procedural Justice with Cross-reference to Substantial Justice from the Perspective of Procedural Constitutionality
Hou He
Abstract
Hou He
Abstract
The fairness pursued in dispute settlement is conventionally divided into substantial justice and procedural justice by scholars in many countries.However,from the perspective of procedural constitutionality,a settlement reached through procedural justice should be deemed as fair,and thus there is no point in emphasizing the substantial justice.Instead,it is more sensible to centralize resources to construct the procedural justice.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The fairness pursued in dispute settlement is conventionally divided into substantial justice and procedural justice by scholars in many countries.However,from the perspective of procedural constitutionality,a settlement reached through procedural justice should be deemed as fair,and thus there is no point in emphasizing the substantial justice.Instead,it is more sensible to centralize resources to construct the procedural justice.
Key concepts: Constitutionality, Procedural justice, Economic Justice, Settlement (finance), Perspective (graphical), Political science, Law, Law and economics