2014Unpublished venueRequires access

A Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Abdominal Myomectomy

Ji Chang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the curative effects of laparoscopic and open myomectomy. Methods The clinical data of laparoscopic myomectomy( n = 75) and abdominal myomectomy( n = 82) from January 2008 to January 2010 was analyzed retrospectively. Results Conversions to open surgery were required in 2 cases in the laparoscopic group. The operative time was shorter in the open group than in the laparoscopic group( P0. 05). The intraoperative haemorrhage volume was less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group( P0. 05). Shorter time in the recovery of bowel movement and hospital stay were achieved in the laparoscopic group than in the open group( P0. 05). The persons with postoperative highest temperature 37. 8℃ were fewer in the laparoscopic group than in the open group( P = 0. 012). The hospitalization cost was significantly less in the open group than in the laparoscopic group( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative recurrency and pregnancy rate between the laparoscopic group and the open group( P0. 05). Conclusion Though laparoscopic myomectomy has advantages of micro- incision,less bleeding,rapid postoperative recovery and short hospitalization,it cann ' t completely supersede the open myomectomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the curative effects of laparoscopic and open myomectomy. Methods The clinical data of laparoscopic myomectomy( n = 75) and abdominal myomectomy( n = 82) from January 2008 to January 2010 was analyzed retrospectively. Results Conversions to open surgery were required in 2 cases in the laparoscopic group. The operative time was shorter in the open group than in the laparoscopic group( P0. 05). The intraoperative haemorrhage volume was less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group( P0. 05). Shorter time in the recovery of bowel movement and hospital stay were achieved in the laparoscopic group than in the open group( P0. 05). The persons with postoperative highest temperature 37. 8℃ were fewer in the laparoscopic group than in the open group( P = 0. 012). The hospitalization cost was significantly less in the open group than in the laparoscopic group( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative recurrency and pregnancy rate between the laparoscopic group and the open group( P0. 05). Conclusion Though laparoscopic myomectomy has advantages of micro- incision,less bleeding,rapid postoperative recovery and short hospitalization,it cann ' t completely supersede the open myomectomy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the curative effects of laparoscopic and open myomectomy. Methods The clinical data of laparoscopic myomectomy( n = 75) and abdominal myomectomy( n = 82) from January 2008 to January 2010 was analyzed retrospectively. Results Conversions to open surgery were required in 2 cases in the laparoscopic group. The operative time was shorter in the open group than in the laparoscopic group( P0. 05). The intraoperative haemorrhage volume was less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group( P0. 05). Shorter time in the recovery of bowel movement and hospital stay were achieved in the laparoscopic group than in the open group( P0. 05). The persons with postoperative highest temperature 37. 8℃ were fewer in the laparoscopic group than in the open group( P = 0. 012). The hospitalization cost was significantly less in the open group than in the laparoscopic group( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative recurrency and pregnancy rate between the laparoscopic group and the open group( P0. 05). Conclusion Though laparoscopic myomectomy has advantages of micro- incision,less bleeding,rapid postoperative recovery and short hospitalization,it cann ' t completely supersede the open myomectomy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Open surgery, Laparoscopic surgery, Laparoscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Abdominal Myomectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens