2008Chinese Journal of General PracticeRequires access

Comparative Analysis on Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Open Myomectomy

Hua Huai-zhe

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To discuss the clinical value of laparoscopic myomectomy.Methods The operation time,volume of blood loss,temperature recovery time and hospitalization time of patients underwent laparoscopic myomectomy(laparoscopic group,n=21)and open myomectomy(open group,n=37)were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the operation time between the Laparoscopic Group(90.1±33.8 min)and the open group(83.7±30.5min),P0.05.The intraoperative blood loss in the Laparoscopic Group(71.1±38.5 ml)was significantly less than that in the open group(113.6±53.8),P0.01.The temperature recovery time and hospitalization time were(1.3±0.8 d,4.1±1.0 d)in the laparoscopic group and(2.8±1.4 d,7.6±1.7 d)in the open group,and there was statistically significant between the two groups P0.01.Conclusions Laparoscopic myomectomy has advantages of micro-invasion,little blood loss,rapid postoperative recovery,and short hospitalization time.However,it cannot entirely supersede the open myomectomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To discuss the clinical value of laparoscopic myomectomy.Methods The operation time,volume of blood loss,temperature recovery time and hospitalization time of patients underwent laparoscopic myomectomy(laparoscopic group,n=21)and open myomectomy(open group,n=37)were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the operation time between the Laparoscopic Group(90.1±33.8 min)and the open group(83.7±30.5min),P0.05.The intraoperative blood loss in the Laparoscopic Group(71.1±38.5 ml)was significantly less than that in the open group(113.6±53.8),P0.01.The temperature recovery time and hospitalization time were(1.3±0.8 d,4.1±1.0 d)in the laparoscopic group and(2.8±1.4 d,7.6±1.7 d)in the open group,and there was statistically significant between the two groups P0.01.Conclusions Laparoscopic myomectomy has advantages of micro-invasion,little blood loss,rapid postoperative recovery,and short hospitalization time.However,it cannot entirely supersede the open myomectomy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To discuss the clinical value of laparoscopic myomectomy.Methods The operation time,volume of blood loss,temperature recovery time and hospitalization time of patients underwent laparoscopic myomectomy(laparoscopic group,n=21)and open myomectomy(open group,n=37)were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the operation time between the Laparoscopic Group(90.1±33.8 min)and the open group(83.7±30.5min),P0.05.The intraoperative blood loss in the Laparoscopic Group(71.1±38.5 ml)was significantly less than that in the open group(113.6±53.8),P0.01.The temperature recovery time and hospitalization time were(1.3±0.8 d,4.1±1.0 d)in the laparoscopic group and(2.8±1.4 d,7.6±1.7 d)in the open group,and there was statistically significant between the two groups P0.01.Conclusions Laparoscopic myomectomy has advantages of micro-invasion,little blood loss,rapid postoperative recovery,and short hospitalization time.However,it cannot entirely supersede the open myomectomy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Blood loss, Surgery, Laparoscopy, Open surgery, Uterine myomectomy, Significant difference, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Analysis on Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Open Myomectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens