2015China Foreign Medical TreatmentRequires access

Research on Clinical Efficacy of Olsalazine and Sulfadiazine in Treatment of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Du Jian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore and compare the clinical efficacy of olsalazine and sulfadiazine in treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods 88 confirmed patients with ulcerative colitis randomly selected from September 2014 and August 2013 were divided into study group and control group by coin toss with 44 in each one. The patients in the study group were treated with olsalazine while those in the control group were treated with sulfadiazine. The clinical efficacy and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups. Results Two different therapeutic methods were adopted for the patients in the two groups respectively, and the overall effective rate(93.18% vs 77.27%, χ2=4.217, P 0.05) was obviously higher in the study group than in the control group with statistically significant difference. The total adverse reaction rate(6.82% vs 27.27%, χ2=4.513, P 0.05) was obviously lower in the study group than in the control group with statistically significant difference. Conclusion Compared with sulfadiazine, olsalazine shows much better clinical efficacy in treating patients with ulcerative colitis, meanwhile it is of high safety and less adverse reaction, therefore it is worthy of clinical promotion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore and compare the clinical efficacy of olsalazine and sulfadiazine in treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods 88 confirmed patients with ulcerative colitis randomly selected from September 2014 and August 2013 were divided into study group and control group by coin toss with 44 in each one. The patients in the study group were treated with olsalazine while those in the control group were treated with sulfadiazine. The clinical efficacy and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups. Results Two different therapeutic methods were adopted for the patients in the two groups respectively, and the overall effective rate(93.18% vs 77.27%, χ2=4.217, P 0.05) was obviously higher in the study group than in the control group with statistically significant difference. The total adverse reaction rate(6.82% vs 27.27%, χ2=4.513, P 0.05) was obviously lower in the study group than in the control group with statistically significant difference. Conclusion Compared with sulfadiazine, olsalazine shows much better clinical efficacy in treating patients with ulcerative colitis, meanwhile it is of high safety and less adverse reaction, therefore it is worthy of clinical promotion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore and compare the clinical efficacy of olsalazine and sulfadiazine in treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods 88 confirmed patients with ulcerative colitis randomly selected from September 2014 and August 2013 were divided into study group and control group by coin toss with 44 in each one. The patients in the study group were treated with olsalazine while those in the control group were treated with sulfadiazine. The clinical efficacy and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups. Results Two different therapeutic methods were adopted for the patients in the two groups respectively, and the overall effective rate(93.18% vs 77.27%, χ2=4.217, P 0.05) was obviously higher in the study group than in the control group with statistically significant difference. The total adverse reaction rate(6.82% vs 27.27%, χ2=4.513, P 0.05) was obviously lower in the study group than in the control group with statistically significant difference. Conclusion Compared with sulfadiazine, olsalazine shows much better clinical efficacy in treating patients with ulcerative colitis, meanwhile it is of high safety and less adverse reaction, therefore it is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ulcerative colitis, Sulfadiazine, Clinical efficacy, Internal medicine, Adverse effect, Gastroenterology, Silver sulfadiazine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Research on Clinical Efficacy of Olsalazine and Sulfadiazine in Treatment of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens