2012•Jiangsu Medical JournalRequires access

Clinical application of ProTaper NiTi manual file in root canal therapy for primary molars

MA Ya

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of using ProTaper manual file and stainless steel hand file in root canal therapy for primary teeth.Methods Fifty primary molars requiring root canal therapy in 47 children of 4-8 years old were equally randomized into two groups of A(using ProTaper NiTi flies with crown down technique) and B(stainless steel file with step back technique).The preparation time,postoperative reactions and the quality of root canal filling radiographically with vitapex were compared between two groups.Results Compared to group B,the preparation time of group A was shorter with better filling efficiency and less postoperative reactions(P0.05).Conclusion Compared to stainless steel file with step back technique,ProTape manual file has the advantages of shorter time spent on preparation,better filling efficiency and less postoperative reactions in root canal therapy for primary molars.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of using ProTaper manual file and stainless steel hand file in root canal therapy for primary teeth.Methods Fifty primary molars requiring root canal therapy in 47 children of 4-8 years old were equally randomized into two groups of A(using ProTaper NiTi flies with crown down technique) and B(stainless steel file with step back technique).The preparation time,postoperative reactions and the quality of root canal filling radiographically with vitapex were compared between two groups.Results Compared to group B,the preparation time of group A was shorter with better filling efficiency and less postoperative reactions(P0.05).Conclusion Compared to stainless steel file with step back technique,ProTape manual file has the advantages of shorter time spent on preparation,better filling efficiency and less postoperative reactions in root canal therapy for primary molars.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of using ProTaper manual file and stainless steel hand file in root canal therapy for primary teeth.Methods Fifty primary molars requiring root canal therapy in 47 children of 4-8 years old were equally randomized into two groups of A(using ProTaper NiTi flies with crown down technique) and B(stainless steel file with step back technique).The preparation time,postoperative reactions and the quality of root canal filling radiographically with vitapex were compared between two groups.Results Compared to group B,the preparation time of group A was shorter with better filling efficiency and less postoperative reactions(P0.05).Conclusion Compared to stainless steel file with step back technique,ProTape manual file has the advantages of shorter time spent on preparation,better filling efficiency and less postoperative reactions in root canal therapy for primary molars.

Key concepts: Root canal, Molar, Dentistry, Medicine, Nickel titanium, Crown (dentistry), Orthodontics, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical application of ProTaper NiTi manual file in root canal therapy for primary molars — Research Paper | ScholarLens