2008•International Journal of StomatologyRequires access

Clinical observation between ProTaper nickel-titanium hand-file and stainless steel H file in root canal preparation

Ren Zhi-we

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of root canal preparation between the techniques of using ProTaper nickel-titanium hand-file and the standard hand stainless steel H file. Methods 120 teeth of 100 cases of pulpitis and periapical periodontitis were randomly divided into two groups, 60 teeth in each. 60 teeth of group 1 were used standard hand stainless steel H file and step-back technique. 60 teeth of group 2 were used ProTaper nickel-titanium hand-file preparation and crown-downward technique. The clinical efficacy was observed for three months after root canal therapy completed. Results After the root canal therapy completed, the clinical efficacy of group 2 was superior to that of group 1(P0.05). Conclusion Using ProTaper flexible hand-file system, the success rate of root canal preparation is high. And the techniques of using ProTaper flexible hand-file system is worthy of promotion and application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of root canal preparation between the techniques of using ProTaper nickel-titanium hand-file and the standard hand stainless steel H file. Methods 120 teeth of 100 cases of pulpitis and periapical periodontitis were randomly divided into two groups, 60 teeth in each. 60 teeth of group 1 were used standard hand stainless steel H file and step-back technique. 60 teeth of group 2 were used ProTaper nickel-titanium hand-file preparation and crown-downward technique. The clinical efficacy was observed for three months after root canal therapy completed. Results After the root canal therapy completed, the clinical efficacy of group 2 was superior to that of group 1(P0.05). Conclusion Using ProTaper flexible hand-file system, the success rate of root canal preparation is high. And the techniques of using ProTaper flexible hand-file system is worthy of promotion and application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of root canal preparation between the techniques of using ProTaper nickel-titanium hand-file and the standard hand stainless steel H file. Methods 120 teeth of 100 cases of pulpitis and periapical periodontitis were randomly divided into two groups, 60 teeth in each. 60 teeth of group 1 were used standard hand stainless steel H file and step-back technique. 60 teeth of group 2 were used ProTaper nickel-titanium hand-file preparation and crown-downward technique. The clinical efficacy was observed for three months after root canal therapy completed. Results After the root canal therapy completed, the clinical efficacy of group 2 was superior to that of group 1(P0.05). Conclusion Using ProTaper flexible hand-file system, the success rate of root canal preparation is high. And the techniques of using ProTaper flexible hand-file system is worthy of promotion and application.

Key concepts: Root canal, Dentistry, Nickel titanium, Orthodontics, Medicine, Materials science, Metallurgy, Shape-memory alloy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical observation between ProTaper nickel-titanium hand-file and stainless steel H file in root canal preparation — Research Paper | ScholarLens