2003Zhonghua quanke yishi zazhiRequires access

Effectiveness of diclofenac suppository and injectio amidopyrini compositae in treatment for surgical infection with high fever

Xiuyu Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare their antipyretic effect of diclofenac suppository (diclofenac) and injectio amidopyrini compositae (amidopyrin) in the treatment for surgical infection with high fever. Methods One hundred patients suffering from surgical infection with high fever were randomly divided into two groups: 50 cases in diclofenac group (50 mg with rectal administration) and 50 cases in amidopyrin group (2 ml, with intramuscular injection) , and their antipyretic effects were observed. Results The antipyretic effect of diclofenac (with an overall effective rate of 96% ) was better than that of amidopyrin (82% ), with a P-value less than 0.05, and their remarkably effective rates were 82% and 58% for the two groups, respectively, with a P-value less than P0.01. Their average body temperature lowered to 36.51 and 37.8 ℃ in two groups, respectively (P 0.001)two hours after drug administration. Their antipyretic effect could be sustained for (11.7±2.4) h in the diclofenac group, longer than those in the amidopyrin group (7.7±2.0) h, (P0.001) . Conclusion The efficacy of diclofenac in treating surgical infection with high fever was more satisfactory and superior than that of amidopyrin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare their antipyretic effect of diclofenac suppository (diclofenac) and injectio amidopyrini compositae (amidopyrin) in the treatment for surgical infection with high fever. Methods One hundred patients suffering from surgical infection with high fever were randomly divided into two groups: 50 cases in diclofenac group (50 mg with rectal administration) and 50 cases in amidopyrin group (2 ml, with intramuscular injection) , and their antipyretic effects were observed. Results The antipyretic effect of diclofenac (with an overall effective rate of 96% ) was better than that of amidopyrin (82% ), with a P-value less than 0.05, and their remarkably effective rates were 82% and 58% for the two groups, respectively, with a P-value less than P0.01. Their average body temperature lowered to 36.51 and 37.8 ℃ in two groups, respectively (P 0.001)two hours after drug administration. Their antipyretic effect could be sustained for (11.7±2.4) h in the diclofenac group, longer than those in the amidopyrin group (7.7±2.0) h, (P0.001) . Conclusion The efficacy of diclofenac in treating surgical infection with high fever was more satisfactory and superior than that of amidopyrin.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare their antipyretic effect of diclofenac suppository (diclofenac) and injectio amidopyrini compositae (amidopyrin) in the treatment for surgical infection with high fever. Methods One hundred patients suffering from surgical infection with high fever were randomly divided into two groups: 50 cases in diclofenac group (50 mg with rectal administration) and 50 cases in amidopyrin group (2 ml, with intramuscular injection) , and their antipyretic effects were observed. Results The antipyretic effect of diclofenac (with an overall effective rate of 96% ) was better than that of amidopyrin (82% ), with a P-value less than 0.05, and their remarkably effective rates were 82% and 58% for the two groups, respectively, with a P-value less than P0.01. Their average body temperature lowered to 36.51 and 37.8 ℃ in two groups, respectively (P 0.001)two hours after drug administration. Their antipyretic effect could be sustained for (11.7±2.4) h in the diclofenac group, longer than those in the amidopyrin group (7.7±2.0) h, (P0.001) . Conclusion The efficacy of diclofenac in treating surgical infection with high fever was more satisfactory and superior than that of amidopyrin.

Key concepts: Antipyretic, Suppository, Diclofenac, Medicine, Diclofenac Sodium, Anesthesia, Rectal administration, Intramuscular injection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effectiveness of diclofenac suppository and injectio amidopyrini compositae in treatment for surgical infection with high fever — Research Paper | ScholarLens