2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Pentacam,Orbscan II and A-mode ultrasound

Min Lu, Xiang Ye

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the difference of central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by Pentacam,Orbscan Ⅱ and A-mode ultrasound.Methods CCT in 148 eyes of 74 patients were measured by Pentacam,Orbscan Ⅱ and A-mode ultrasound before refractive surgery,respectively.The difference of CCT was compared,and the correlation and concordance of three measurements were analyzed.Results The mean CCT measured by Pentacam,Orbscan Ⅱ,and A-mode ultrasound were (540.00±27.47)μm,(528.00±25.29)μm and (537.82±24.34)μm,respectively.The CCT measured by Orbscan Ⅱ was obvious lower than that measured by Pentacam and A-mode ultrasound,there were statistical differences(both P0.05).There was a significant linear correlation in CCT measured by three measurements (P0.05),especially between Pentacam and A-mode ultrasound.The mean differences and upper/lower LOA for CCT measurements were (4.50±14.31)μm and 22.47 μm/-13.47 μm between Pentacam and A-mode ultrasound,(11.39±15.13)μm and 40.08 μm/-17.31 μm between Pentacam and Orbscan Ⅱ,(7.15±16.03)μm and 28.46 μm/-14.16 μm between A-mode ultrasound and Orbscan Ⅱ.None of the CCT values measured by three measurements was correlated with refraction spherical equivalent (P0.05).Conclusions Pentacam has better agreement with the gold standard A-mode ultrasound,as compared with Orbscan Ⅱ.The CCT measured by three measurements have certain correlation,but also have the differences,these instruments should not be used interchangeably for CCT measurement in clinic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the difference of central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by Pentacam,Orbscan Ⅱ and A-mode ultrasound.Methods CCT in 148 eyes of 74 patients were measured by Pentacam,Orbscan Ⅱ and A-mode ultrasound before refractive surgery,respectively.The difference of CCT was compared,and the correlation and concordance of three measurements were analyzed.Results The mean CCT measured by Pentacam,Orbscan Ⅱ,and A-mode ultrasound were (540.00±27.47)μm,(528.00±25.29)μm and (537.82±24.34)μm,respectively.The CCT measured by Orbscan Ⅱ was obvious lower than that measured by Pentacam and A-mode ultrasound,there were statistical differences(both P0.05).There was a significant linear correlation in CCT measured by three measurements (P0.05),especially between Pentacam and A-mode ultrasound.The mean differences and upper/lower LOA for CCT measurements were (4.50±14.31)μm and 22.47 μm/-13.47 μm between Pentacam and A-mode ultrasound,(11.39±15.13)μm and 40.08 μm/-17.31 μm between Pentacam and Orbscan Ⅱ,(7.15±16.03)μm and 28.46 μm/-14.16 μm between A-mode ultrasound and Orbscan Ⅱ.None of the CCT values measured by three measurements was correlated with refraction spherical equivalent (P0.05).Conclusions Pentacam has better agreement with the gold standard A-mode ultrasound,as compared with Orbscan Ⅱ.The CCT measured by three measurements have certain correlation,but also have the differences,these instruments should not be used interchangeably for CCT measurement in clinic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the difference of central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by Pentacam,Orbscan Ⅱ and A-mode ultrasound.Methods CCT in 148 eyes of 74 patients were measured by Pentacam,Orbscan Ⅱ and A-mode ultrasound before refractive surgery,respectively.The difference of CCT was compared,and the correlation and concordance of three measurements were analyzed.Results The mean CCT measured by Pentacam,Orbscan Ⅱ,and A-mode ultrasound were (540.00±27.47)μm,(528.00±25.29)μm and (537.82±24.34)μm,respectively.The CCT measured by Orbscan Ⅱ was obvious lower than that measured by Pentacam and A-mode ultrasound,there were statistical differences(both P0.05).There was a significant linear correlation in CCT measured by three measurements (P0.05),especially between Pentacam and A-mode ultrasound.The mean differences and upper/lower LOA for CCT measurements were (4.50±14.31)μm and 22.47 μm/-13.47 μm between Pentacam and A-mode ultrasound,(11.39±15.13)μm and 40.08 μm/-17.31 μm between Pentacam and Orbscan Ⅱ,(7.15±16.03)μm and 28.46 μm/-14.16 μm between A-mode ultrasound and Orbscan Ⅱ.None of the CCT values measured by three measurements was correlated with refraction spherical equivalent (P0.05).Conclusions Pentacam has better agreement with the gold standard A-mode ultrasound,as compared with Orbscan Ⅱ.The CCT measured by three measurements have certain correlation,but also have the differences,these instruments should not be used interchangeably for CCT measurement in clinic.

Key concepts: Ophthalmology, Ultrasound, Concordance, Medicine, Significant difference, Radiology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Pentacam,Orbscan II and A-mode ultrasound — Research Paper | ScholarLens