Comparative study on two chemiluminescence immunoassay systems in detecting carbohydrate antigen 19-9
Peng You-shen
Abstract
Peng You-shen
Abstract
Objective To compare the results carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)determined by two different chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA)systems(A:Cobas 411,B:Beckman Dxi800).Methods Referring to the EP9-A2document,40serum samples from different patients were collected and CA19-9levels were tested by the 2 different CLIA systems respectively.The collected data were processed by statistical analysis.A system was use as standard system to evaluate the acceptability of B system.Results There were no significant different between two different CLIA systems in rank sum test(P0.05).Linear regression equations that B system for Asystem were YB =1.0812 XA-4.848 4,r2=0.962 2.In Specified concentration 25U/mL and 250U/mL of CA19-9,B relative bias is 11.28%and 6.00%.By CA19-9biological variation in the best total allowable error(TEa)22.1%for the standard. System B was completely acceptable.Conclusion There is comparability of two CLIA systems in the evaluation of clinical acceptability of CA19-9and the difference between them is acceptable.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the results carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)determined by two different chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA)systems(A:Cobas 411,B:Beckman Dxi800).Methods Referring to the EP9-A2document,40serum samples from different patients were collected and CA19-9levels were tested by the 2 different CLIA systems respectively.The collected data were processed by statistical analysis.A system was use as standard system to evaluate the acceptability of B system.Results There were no significant different between two different CLIA systems in rank sum test(P0.05).Linear regression equations that B system for Asystem were YB =1.0812 XA-4.848 4,r2=0.962 2.In Specified concentration 25U/mL and 250U/mL of CA19-9,B relative bias is 11.28%and 6.00%.By CA19-9biological variation in the best total allowable error(TEa)22.1%for the standard. System B was completely acceptable.Conclusion There is comparability of two CLIA systems in the evaluation of clinical acceptability of CA19-9and the difference between them is acceptable.
Key concepts: Chemiluminescence, Immunoassay, Statistics, Comparability, Chromatography, Mathematics, Chemistry, Medicine