2014Laboratory Medicine and ClinicRequires access

Comparative study on two chemiluminescence immunoassay systems in detecting carbohydrate antigen 19-9

Peng You-shen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the results carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)determined by two different chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA)systems(A:Cobas 411,B:Beckman Dxi800).Methods Referring to the EP9-A2document,40serum samples from different patients were collected and CA19-9levels were tested by the 2 different CLIA systems respectively.The collected data were processed by statistical analysis.A system was use as standard system to evaluate the acceptability of B system.Results There were no significant different between two different CLIA systems in rank sum test(P0.05).Linear regression equations that B system for Asystem were YB =1.0812 XA-4.848 4,r2=0.962 2.In Specified concentration 25U/mL and 250U/mL of CA19-9,B relative bias is 11.28%and 6.00%.By CA19-9biological variation in the best total allowable error(TEa)22.1%for the standard. System B was completely acceptable.Conclusion There is comparability of two CLIA systems in the evaluation of clinical acceptability of CA19-9and the difference between them is acceptable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the results carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)determined by two different chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA)systems(A:Cobas 411,B:Beckman Dxi800).Methods Referring to the EP9-A2document,40serum samples from different patients were collected and CA19-9levels were tested by the 2 different CLIA systems respectively.The collected data were processed by statistical analysis.A system was use as standard system to evaluate the acceptability of B system.Results There were no significant different between two different CLIA systems in rank sum test(P0.05).Linear regression equations that B system for Asystem were YB =1.0812 XA-4.848 4,r2=0.962 2.In Specified concentration 25U/mL and 250U/mL of CA19-9,B relative bias is 11.28%and 6.00%.By CA19-9biological variation in the best total allowable error(TEa)22.1%for the standard. System B was completely acceptable.Conclusion There is comparability of two CLIA systems in the evaluation of clinical acceptability of CA19-9and the difference between them is acceptable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the results carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)determined by two different chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA)systems(A:Cobas 411,B:Beckman Dxi800).Methods Referring to the EP9-A2document,40serum samples from different patients were collected and CA19-9levels were tested by the 2 different CLIA systems respectively.The collected data were processed by statistical analysis.A system was use as standard system to evaluate the acceptability of B system.Results There were no significant different between two different CLIA systems in rank sum test(P0.05).Linear regression equations that B system for Asystem were YB =1.0812 XA-4.848 4,r2=0.962 2.In Specified concentration 25U/mL and 250U/mL of CA19-9,B relative bias is 11.28%and 6.00%.By CA19-9biological variation in the best total allowable error(TEa)22.1%for the standard. System B was completely acceptable.Conclusion There is comparability of two CLIA systems in the evaluation of clinical acceptability of CA19-9and the difference between them is acceptable.

Key concepts: Chemiluminescence, Immunoassay, Statistics, Comparability, Chromatography, Mathematics, Chemistry, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study on two chemiluminescence immunoassay systems in detecting carbohydrate antigen 19-9 — Research Paper | ScholarLens