2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Curative effect and nursing points of different kinds of gargle oral infection prevention after tooth extraction

Linglin Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective Study on effect of different types of oral infection prevention after tooth extraction solution, provides the reference for the clinical nursing. Methods In 2013 June to 2014 year in October the oral infection with different preventive gargle in the treatment of 150 cases of patients treated in our hospital department of Stomatology after receiving tooth extraction, the patients were randomly divided into 3 groups, each 50 cases, were treated with a povidone iodine solution,hydrogen peroxide solution and physiological saline 3 a gargle, observed after oral infection rate of. Results 150 cases of patients with oral cavity after tooth extraction treatment of Department of Stomatology infection13 cases, postoperative infection rate was 8.67%; and the 3 kinds of oral infection prevention mouthwashafter tooth extraction effect is not the same, containing mouthwash povidone iodine liquid used in postoperative patients with oral cavity infection rate was 0, the difference was statistically signifi cant(P0.05). Conclusion The best effect with povidone iodine liquid after extraction with prevention of oral infection, can effectively inhibit oral bacteria infection in patients after hospital treatment, patients in the Department of Stomatologyafter tooth extraction, should be reasonable to choose the recovery effect of mouthwash, so as to improve thepostoperative patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Study on effect of different types of oral infection prevention after tooth extraction solution, provides the reference for the clinical nursing. Methods In 2013 June to 2014 year in October the oral infection with different preventive gargle in the treatment of 150 cases of patients treated in our hospital department of Stomatology after receiving tooth extraction, the patients were randomly divided into 3 groups, each 50 cases, were treated with a povidone iodine solution,hydrogen peroxide solution and physiological saline 3 a gargle, observed after oral infection rate of. Results 150 cases of patients with oral cavity after tooth extraction treatment of Department of Stomatology infection13 cases, postoperative infection rate was 8.67%; and the 3 kinds of oral infection prevention mouthwashafter tooth extraction effect is not the same, containing mouthwash povidone iodine liquid used in postoperative patients with oral cavity infection rate was 0, the difference was statistically signifi cant(P0.05). Conclusion The best effect with povidone iodine liquid after extraction with prevention of oral infection, can effectively inhibit oral bacteria infection in patients after hospital treatment, patients in the Department of Stomatologyafter tooth extraction, should be reasonable to choose the recovery effect of mouthwash, so as to improve thepostoperative patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Study on effect of different types of oral infection prevention after tooth extraction solution, provides the reference for the clinical nursing. Methods In 2013 June to 2014 year in October the oral infection with different preventive gargle in the treatment of 150 cases of patients treated in our hospital department of Stomatology after receiving tooth extraction, the patients were randomly divided into 3 groups, each 50 cases, were treated with a povidone iodine solution,hydrogen peroxide solution and physiological saline 3 a gargle, observed after oral infection rate of. Results 150 cases of patients with oral cavity after tooth extraction treatment of Department of Stomatology infection13 cases, postoperative infection rate was 8.67%; and the 3 kinds of oral infection prevention mouthwashafter tooth extraction effect is not the same, containing mouthwash povidone iodine liquid used in postoperative patients with oral cavity infection rate was 0, the difference was statistically signifi cant(P0.05). Conclusion The best effect with povidone iodine liquid after extraction with prevention of oral infection, can effectively inhibit oral bacteria infection in patients after hospital treatment, patients in the Department of Stomatologyafter tooth extraction, should be reasonable to choose the recovery effect of mouthwash, so as to improve thepostoperative patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dentistry, Iodine, Oral hygiene, Tooth brushing, Infection control, Saline, Oral cavity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Curative effect and nursing points of different kinds of gargle oral infection prevention after tooth extraction — Research Paper | ScholarLens