2015China Medical HeraldRequires access

Effect evaluation of health promotion and health education intervention in middle-aged and elderly sub-healthy patients

Liao Shengw

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore effect of health promotion and health education intervention in middle-aged and elderly sub healthy patients in the community. Methods In December 2010 in Tonghe Community of Guangzhou City, 88 cases middle-aged and elderly sub healthy patients were selected as research objects. They were randomly divided into observation group and control group. They were given comprehensive intervention measures of hospital level + community level + family level and single intervention measures and methods repestively. The effects and symptom score of two groups were observed and compared. Results The total clinical efficiency of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group(93.18% vs 56.82%), with statistical significance difference(P 0.01); After intervention, the sub healthy symptom scores of subjects of observation group was significantly lower than that of control group[(4.32±0.63) score vs(10.23±3.10) score], with statistical significance difference(P 0.01). Conclusion Compared with single intervention measures, the hospital, community and family joint intervention measures and methods can effectively improve community middle-aged and elderly sub healthy state, which is the ideal choice for practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore effect of health promotion and health education intervention in middle-aged and elderly sub healthy patients in the community. Methods In December 2010 in Tonghe Community of Guangzhou City, 88 cases middle-aged and elderly sub healthy patients were selected as research objects. They were randomly divided into observation group and control group. They were given comprehensive intervention measures of hospital level + community level + family level and single intervention measures and methods repestively. The effects and symptom score of two groups were observed and compared. Results The total clinical efficiency of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group(93.18% vs 56.82%), with statistical significance difference(P 0.01); After intervention, the sub healthy symptom scores of subjects of observation group was significantly lower than that of control group[(4.32±0.63) score vs(10.23±3.10) score], with statistical significance difference(P 0.01). Conclusion Compared with single intervention measures, the hospital, community and family joint intervention measures and methods can effectively improve community middle-aged and elderly sub healthy state, which is the ideal choice for practice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore effect of health promotion and health education intervention in middle-aged and elderly sub healthy patients in the community. Methods In December 2010 in Tonghe Community of Guangzhou City, 88 cases middle-aged and elderly sub healthy patients were selected as research objects. They were randomly divided into observation group and control group. They were given comprehensive intervention measures of hospital level + community level + family level and single intervention measures and methods repestively. The effects and symptom score of two groups were observed and compared. Results The total clinical efficiency of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group(93.18% vs 56.82%), with statistical significance difference(P 0.01); After intervention, the sub healthy symptom scores of subjects of observation group was significantly lower than that of control group[(4.32±0.63) score vs(10.23±3.10) score], with statistical significance difference(P 0.01). Conclusion Compared with single intervention measures, the hospital, community and family joint intervention measures and methods can effectively improve community middle-aged and elderly sub healthy state, which is the ideal choice for practice.

Key concepts: Medicine, Statistical significance, Intervention (counseling), Health education, Health promotion, Physical therapy, Promotion (chess), Gerontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect evaluation of health promotion and health education intervention in middle-aged and elderly sub-healthy patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens