2011The Journal of Medical Theory and PracticeRequires access

Comparison of the Clinical Application of Multiple Punch Biopsy Under Colposcopy and LEEP in the Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Ji Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To explore the comparison of the clinical application of multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy and LEEP in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Methods:120 patients of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed by multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy in our hospital were treated with LEEP,and the samples were examined by pathology.Compared the accuracy of two methods.Results:The accuracy of the two methods was 71.1% in CIN Ⅰ,53.8%in CIN Ⅱ,43.3% in CIN Ⅲ.Conclusion:There was difference in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy and LEEP.The patients of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosised by multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy can choose to treated by LEEP,and the sample were examined by pathology after the operation.It can achieve a further definitive diagnosis,improve the disease diagnosis accuracy and reduce the occurrence of misdiagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To explore the comparison of the clinical application of multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy and LEEP in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Methods:120 patients of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed by multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy in our hospital were treated with LEEP,and the samples were examined by pathology.Compared the accuracy of two methods.Results:The accuracy of the two methods was 71.1% in CIN Ⅰ,53.8%in CIN Ⅱ,43.3% in CIN Ⅲ.Conclusion:There was difference in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy and LEEP.The patients of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosised by multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy can choose to treated by LEEP,and the sample were examined by pathology after the operation.It can achieve a further definitive diagnosis,improve the disease diagnosis accuracy and reduce the occurrence of misdiagnosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To explore the comparison of the clinical application of multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy and LEEP in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Methods:120 patients of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed by multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy in our hospital were treated with LEEP,and the samples were examined by pathology.Compared the accuracy of two methods.Results:The accuracy of the two methods was 71.1% in CIN Ⅰ,53.8%in CIN Ⅱ,43.3% in CIN Ⅲ.Conclusion:There was difference in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy and LEEP.The patients of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosised by multiple punch biopsy under colposcopy can choose to treated by LEEP,and the sample were examined by pathology after the operation.It can achieve a further definitive diagnosis,improve the disease diagnosis accuracy and reduce the occurrence of misdiagnosis.

Key concepts: Colposcopy, Medicine, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Punch Biopsy, Biopsy, Intraepithelial neoplasia, Gynecology, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Clinical Application of Multiple Punch Biopsy Under Colposcopy and LEEP in the Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia — Research Paper | ScholarLens