2012Sichuan Medical JournalRequires access

Comparative analysis of dynamic electrocardiogram and coronaryarteriography in coronary artery disease

Tian Qin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the value of dynamic electrocardiogram and coronaryarteriography in coronary artery disease.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 48 cases with coronary artery disease treated in our department from October 2008 to October 2010,electrocardiogram were compared with that of coronary arteriograph.Results The sensitivity of electrocardiogram on diagnosing coronary artery disease is 66.7%,the specificity is 71.4%(P0.05);the positive rate of diagnosing muhivessel damage of coronary artery disease(88.9%) is significantly higher than diagnosing bivessel damage(53.8%)or monovessel damage(62.5%)by electrocardiogram(P0.05).Conclusion Electrocardiogram and coronaryarteriography are effective diagnotic methods in the coronary artery disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the value of dynamic electrocardiogram and coronaryarteriography in coronary artery disease.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 48 cases with coronary artery disease treated in our department from October 2008 to October 2010,electrocardiogram were compared with that of coronary arteriograph.Results The sensitivity of electrocardiogram on diagnosing coronary artery disease is 66.7%,the specificity is 71.4%(P0.05);the positive rate of diagnosing muhivessel damage of coronary artery disease(88.9%) is significantly higher than diagnosing bivessel damage(53.8%)or monovessel damage(62.5%)by electrocardiogram(P0.05).Conclusion Electrocardiogram and coronaryarteriography are effective diagnotic methods in the coronary artery disease.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the value of dynamic electrocardiogram and coronaryarteriography in coronary artery disease.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 48 cases with coronary artery disease treated in our department from October 2008 to October 2010,electrocardiogram were compared with that of coronary arteriograph.Results The sensitivity of electrocardiogram on diagnosing coronary artery disease is 66.7%,the specificity is 71.4%(P0.05);the positive rate of diagnosing muhivessel damage of coronary artery disease(88.9%) is significantly higher than diagnosing bivessel damage(53.8%)or monovessel damage(62.5%)by electrocardiogram(P0.05).Conclusion Electrocardiogram and coronaryarteriography are effective diagnotic methods in the coronary artery disease.

Key concepts: Medicine, Coronary artery disease, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Artery, Electrocardiography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative analysis of dynamic electrocardiogram and coronaryarteriography in coronary artery disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens