2002Yati yasui yazhoubingxue zazhiRequires access

Clinical Observation on treatment of chronic apical periodontitis with different root canal filling materials

Jiao Hui-min

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM:To compare the clinical effect of treatment of chronic apical periodontitis with vitapex paste alone or combined with gutta-percha. METHODS: 212 patients with 273 infected teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Group A were treated with vitapex paste alone. Group B were treated with vitapex paste plus gutta-percha. Group C were treated with traditional zinic exide olive oil paste plus gutta-percha. Periapical radiograph was taken before and after 1 year. RESULTS: After one year, success rates of three groups were 96.70%, 98.90%, 89.01% respectively. Difference between Group A and C, Group B and C were significant( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: The vitapex paste is a new and simple filling material and shows better clinical treatment effect using alone or combined with gutta-percha. It is suitable for widespread adoption in root canal treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM:To compare the clinical effect of treatment of chronic apical periodontitis with vitapex paste alone or combined with gutta-percha. METHODS: 212 patients with 273 infected teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Group A were treated with vitapex paste alone. Group B were treated with vitapex paste plus gutta-percha. Group C were treated with traditional zinic exide olive oil paste plus gutta-percha. Periapical radiograph was taken before and after 1 year. RESULTS: After one year, success rates of three groups were 96.70%, 98.90%, 89.01% respectively. Difference between Group A and C, Group B and C were significant( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: The vitapex paste is a new and simple filling material and shows better clinical treatment effect using alone or combined with gutta-percha. It is suitable for widespread adoption in root canal treatment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM:To compare the clinical effect of treatment of chronic apical periodontitis with vitapex paste alone or combined with gutta-percha. METHODS: 212 patients with 273 infected teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Group A were treated with vitapex paste alone. Group B were treated with vitapex paste plus gutta-percha. Group C were treated with traditional zinic exide olive oil paste plus gutta-percha. Periapical radiograph was taken before and after 1 year. RESULTS: After one year, success rates of three groups were 96.70%, 98.90%, 89.01% respectively. Difference between Group A and C, Group B and C were significant( P 0.05). CONCLUSION: The vitapex paste is a new and simple filling material and shows better clinical treatment effect using alone or combined with gutta-percha. It is suitable for widespread adoption in root canal treatment.

Key concepts: Dentistry, Root canal, Gutta-percha, Medicine, Periodontitis, Chronic periodontitis, Significant difference, Periapical periodontitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Observation on treatment of chronic apical periodontitis with different root canal filling materials — Research Paper | ScholarLens