1998Zhongguo linchuang yaolixue yu zhiliaoxueRequires access

Clinical comparison of antibacterial action of sparfloxacin with lomefloxacin

Ya Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Aim This study aimed at clinical comparative trial of sparfloxacin (SPLX) with lomefloxacin (LMLX). Methods Twenty four patients with bacterial infections in respiratory tract or urinary tract were randomly seperated to two groups of SPLX and LMLX. After administration of 200~300 mg of SPLX once daily or 200~400 mg of LMLX twice daily, the clinical effects were observed and defined as cure, obvious efficiency, effcativeness and no effect. Results Isolation rate of bacteria from patients was 91.7%.Total intake amount of SPLX was significantly less than that of LMLX, but cure rate and effective rate in group SPLX were significantly higher than in group LMLX. There were no adverse drug ractions in both groups. Conclusions SPLX is a safe and effective drug among fluoroquinolones in treatment of bacterial infections. The ratio of effect over dose of sparfloxacin is higher than that of lomefloxacin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim This study aimed at clinical comparative trial of sparfloxacin (SPLX) with lomefloxacin (LMLX). Methods Twenty four patients with bacterial infections in respiratory tract or urinary tract were randomly seperated to two groups of SPLX and LMLX. After administration of 200~300 mg of SPLX once daily or 200~400 mg of LMLX twice daily, the clinical effects were observed and defined as cure, obvious efficiency, effcativeness and no effect. Results Isolation rate of bacteria from patients was 91.7%.Total intake amount of SPLX was significantly less than that of LMLX, but cure rate and effective rate in group SPLX were significantly higher than in group LMLX. There were no adverse drug ractions in both groups. Conclusions SPLX is a safe and effective drug among fluoroquinolones in treatment of bacterial infections. The ratio of effect over dose of sparfloxacin is higher than that of lomefloxacin.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim This study aimed at clinical comparative trial of sparfloxacin (SPLX) with lomefloxacin (LMLX). Methods Twenty four patients with bacterial infections in respiratory tract or urinary tract were randomly seperated to two groups of SPLX and LMLX. After administration of 200~300 mg of SPLX once daily or 200~400 mg of LMLX twice daily, the clinical effects were observed and defined as cure, obvious efficiency, effcativeness and no effect. Results Isolation rate of bacteria from patients was 91.7%.Total intake amount of SPLX was significantly less than that of LMLX, but cure rate and effective rate in group SPLX were significantly higher than in group LMLX. There were no adverse drug ractions in both groups. Conclusions SPLX is a safe and effective drug among fluoroquinolones in treatment of bacterial infections. The ratio of effect over dose of sparfloxacin is higher than that of lomefloxacin.

Key concepts: Sparfloxacin, Lomefloxacin, Medicine, Cure rate, Urinary system, Adverse effect, Drug, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical comparison of antibacterial action of sparfloxacin with lomefloxacin — Research Paper | ScholarLens