1999The Chinese Journal of Clinical PharmacologyRequires access

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED AND OPEN CLINICAL TRIAL ON SPARFLOXACIN COMPARED WITH LOMEFLOXACIN

Jia Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A randomized controlled clinical trial on sparfloxacin compared with lomefloxacin was conducted. 59 patients with respiratory and urinary tsact infections were randomized to receive either sparfloxacin 200 mg po qd or lomefloxacin 200 mg po qd for 7~14 days. The clinical efficacy rates of sparfloxacin and lomefloxacin were 93.3% and 82.8% respectively. The bacterial clearance rates of the two drugs were 96.7% and 92.9% respectively. The adverse drug reactions of both groups were mild with the rates of 6.25% and 6.67% respectively. An open trial on sparfloxacin for 22 patients with skin and soft tissue infections was conducted. The clinical efficacy rate and the bacterial clearance rate were both 100%. The adverse drug reactions were mild with the rates of 13.64%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A randomized controlled clinical trial on sparfloxacin compared with lomefloxacin was conducted. 59 patients with respiratory and urinary tsact infections were randomized to receive either sparfloxacin 200 mg po qd or lomefloxacin 200 mg po qd for 7~14 days. The clinical efficacy rates of sparfloxacin and lomefloxacin were 93.3% and 82.8% respectively. The bacterial clearance rates of the two drugs were 96.7% and 92.9% respectively. The adverse drug reactions of both groups were mild with the rates of 6.25% and 6.67% respectively. An open trial on sparfloxacin for 22 patients with skin and soft tissue infections was conducted. The clinical efficacy rate and the bacterial clearance rate were both 100%. The adverse drug reactions were mild with the rates of 13.64%.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A randomized controlled clinical trial on sparfloxacin compared with lomefloxacin was conducted. 59 patients with respiratory and urinary tsact infections were randomized to receive either sparfloxacin 200 mg po qd or lomefloxacin 200 mg po qd for 7~14 days. The clinical efficacy rates of sparfloxacin and lomefloxacin were 93.3% and 82.8% respectively. The bacterial clearance rates of the two drugs were 96.7% and 92.9% respectively. The adverse drug reactions of both groups were mild with the rates of 6.25% and 6.67% respectively. An open trial on sparfloxacin for 22 patients with skin and soft tissue infections was conducted. The clinical efficacy rate and the bacterial clearance rate were both 100%. The adverse drug reactions were mild with the rates of 13.64%.

Key concepts: Sparfloxacin, Lomefloxacin, Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Adverse effect, Clinical trial, Internal medicine, Clinical efficacy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED AND OPEN CLINICAL TRIAL ON SPARFLOXACIN COMPARED WITH LOMEFLOXACIN — Research Paper | ScholarLens