2008China Modern DoctorRequires access

Comparison of Two Types of Post Core Applied in the Restoration for Residual Crown or Root

Jiang Bing

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect between DT light-post core and metal cast post core applied in the restoration for residual crown or root. Methods Totally 66 cases,aged from 20 to 60,with 90 teeth were selected randomly. 42 teeth were restored with DT light-post core and 48 teeth were restored with metal cast post core. All the teeth were restored with porcelain fused metal crown finally. Results After 0.5 to 2.5 years following-up,one tooth failed for crown loosen in DT light-post core with 97.75% successful rate. Three teeth failed for root fracture,one tooth failed for crown loose,and six teeth failed for gingival grey line in metal cast post core group with 78.78% success rate. Conclusion DT light-post core has better clinical effect than metal cast post core when subjected to the restoration for residual crown or root.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical effect between DT light-post core and metal cast post core applied in the restoration for residual crown or root. Methods Totally 66 cases,aged from 20 to 60,with 90 teeth were selected randomly. 42 teeth were restored with DT light-post core and 48 teeth were restored with metal cast post core. All the teeth were restored with porcelain fused metal crown finally. Results After 0.5 to 2.5 years following-up,one tooth failed for crown loosen in DT light-post core with 97.75% successful rate. Three teeth failed for root fracture,one tooth failed for crown loose,and six teeth failed for gingival grey line in metal cast post core group with 78.78% success rate. Conclusion DT light-post core has better clinical effect than metal cast post core when subjected to the restoration for residual crown or root.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect between DT light-post core and metal cast post core applied in the restoration for residual crown or root. Methods Totally 66 cases,aged from 20 to 60,with 90 teeth were selected randomly. 42 teeth were restored with DT light-post core and 48 teeth were restored with metal cast post core. All the teeth were restored with porcelain fused metal crown finally. Results After 0.5 to 2.5 years following-up,one tooth failed for crown loosen in DT light-post core with 97.75% successful rate. Three teeth failed for root fracture,one tooth failed for crown loose,and six teeth failed for gingival grey line in metal cast post core group with 78.78% success rate. Conclusion DT light-post core has better clinical effect than metal cast post core when subjected to the restoration for residual crown or root.

Key concepts: Crown (dentistry), Medicine, Dentistry, Post and core, Core (optical fiber), Orthodontics, Residual, Composite material

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Two Types of Post Core Applied in the Restoration for Residual Crown or Root — Research Paper | ScholarLens